Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jbhunley: Difference between revisions
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
''Of these, many were from the Jewish[1] intellectual milieu of New York City.[2][3] and [27] on Dual loyalty: In the run up to the invasion of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, charges of dual loyalty were levelled against the neoconservatives from various sectors. The debate was heated, with charges of Antisemitism and counter charges being leveled. The controversy continues into the present due to concerns over neoconservatives disposition toward Iran. '' sure looks iffy, by the way. You missed the "dual loyalty" issue? [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 23:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC) |
''Of these, many were from the Jewish[1] intellectual milieu of New York City.[2][3] and [27] on Dual loyalty: In the run up to the invasion of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, charges of dual loyalty were levelled against the neoconservatives from various sectors. The debate was heated, with charges of Antisemitism and counter charges being leveled. The controversy continues into the present due to concerns over neoconservatives disposition toward Iran. '' sure looks iffy, by the way. You missed the "dual loyalty" issue? [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 23:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
:??????- [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 23:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC) |
:??????- [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 23:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
==Request from candidate re Oppose votes commentary== |
|||
I appreciate very much that people want to point out flaws in some ''Oppose'' votes but I have seen here and at some other recent RfAs that ''Oppose'' voters often feel put-upon or even harassed for their votes. I know that is no one's intent but it does seem to sometimes be the result. I have no desire to silence or curtail anyone from either side but, if when anyone thinks they should reply to an ''Oppose'' and my preference would make the difference between challenging the ''Oppose'' or not please choose not. {{pb}} Thank you for your consideration of this request. [[User:Jbhunley|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:135%;color:#886600">Jbh</span>]][[User_talk:Jbhunley|<span style="color: #00888F"><sup> Talk</sup></span>]] 00:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:03, 31 July 2018
![]() | This is an RfA talk page.
While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
Absolute OPPOSE
I had totally forgotten Hunley's existence. He has accused me of not only opposing him because of his past acts, but even tries to connect me with McCarthyism! (on an unmentionable site) Those who follow RfAs know that I generally examine AfD stats. In fact I am noted for basing votes on RfA figures. But now Hunley has given me an outside reason - a person who holds grudges and attacks those who had grudges years ago as being McCarthyists is unfit to be an Admin by a mile.
You may dislike my stress on AfDs - but you can damn well note my RfA votes generally are on that topic. Collect (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, you were the bad actor in that whole affair. Remember, you lied about other editors on Jimbo's talk page and were eventually topic banned and restricted to 1RR? Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others, in case anyone wants to make note of it.- MrX 🖋 23:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Wanna see how much opportunity I had to rebut some of the "charges"? Sorry MrX - your position here simply adds weight to the fact that anyone who carries grudges as well as Hunley and you should not be given a mop. I did not "lie about other editors on Jimbo's Talk page" for example. and your "grudginess" is ill-suited to civil discourse. Stick to the issue about AfDs. Trying to paint me as Satan is not impressing me one iota. Is there a real reason you suddenly appeared here? I had not mentioned you at all - but you show up. Note this is in response to personal attacks made on me, and is not in any way anything more than that. Collect (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes you did lie, at 13:21, 16 March 2015 UTC. I don't want the mop. And let's not pretend that you oppose Jbhunley for any other reason than grudge against him for this and the drama surrounding your feud with Ubikwit.- MrX 🖋 23:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Of these, many were from the Jewish[1] intellectual milieu of New York City.[2][3] and [27] on Dual loyalty: In the run up to the invasion of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, charges of dual loyalty were levelled against the neoconservatives from various sectors. The debate was heated, with charges of Antisemitism and counter charges being leveled. The controversy continues into the present due to concerns over neoconservatives disposition toward Iran. sure looks iffy, by the way. You missed the "dual loyalty" issue? Collect (talk) 23:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- ??????- MrX 🖋 23:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Request from candidate re Oppose votes commentary
I appreciate very much that people want to point out flaws in some Oppose votes but I have seen here and at some other recent RfAs that Oppose voters often feel put-upon or even harassed for their votes. I know that is no one's intent but it does seem to sometimes be the result. I have no desire to silence or curtail anyone from either side but, if when anyone thinks they should reply to an Oppose and my preference would make the difference between challenging the Oppose or not please choose not.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Jbh Talk 00:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)