Talk:LegalMatch: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
If people are monitoring this article, they might want to keep a close eye towards {{User|67.119.122.102}}, who has been removing references, adding POV, and adding (alleged) linkspam on other articles. [[User:Tinus|Tinus]] 17:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC) |
If people are monitoring this article, they might want to keep a close eye towards {{User|67.119.122.102}}, who has been removing references, adding POV, and adding (alleged) linkspam on other articles. [[User:Tinus|Tinus]] 17:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
== News == |
|||
This interesting press release was added, kind of a bad reference but still informational [[User:Tinus|Tinus]] 01:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[http://www.emailwire.com/cgi-bin/news/db.cgi?db=ads&uid=default&ID=5606&C1=Legal&view_records=1&full_view=1 http://www.emailwire.com/cgi-bin/news/db.cgi?db=ads&uid=default&ID=5606&C1=Legal&view_records=1&full_view=1] |
|||
== Article is not neutral == |
== Article is not neutral == |
||
Revision as of 22:25, 7 November 2006
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. |
Editing by 67.119.122.102
If people are monitoring this article, they might want to keep a close eye towards 67.119.122.102 (talk · contribs), who has been removing references, adding POV, and adding (alleged) linkspam on other articles. Tinus 17:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Article is not neutral
The majority of this article looks like self-promotion. Despite the newsworthiness of the company due to negative press, the article needs to be edited to comply with neutrality guidelines or deleted. Stanley, 19 June 2006.
- It's not likely to be deleted. I proposed it for deletion and it got kept. I'd approve of a substantial rewrite, though, if you want to start on one. AndyJones 17:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Deleted several unsupported sentences that looked more like advertising as opposed to having an objective tone. Stanley, 24 October 2006
Somebody is deleting the news articles that made this article relevant in the first place. Reinstated articles. If the news related to this article is deleted so should the article.