User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions

Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Morton_devonshire.

Wikimedia Foundation

Contents

Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes Closed

See this book review[1], where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work.

Take a look at Roland Rance

I tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another list of pages

User:Rhobite/9/11 watchlist

Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General Motors streetcar conspiracy - more cruft for you. Have fun. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 12:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pearl

[2] Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Wikipedia to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you.

Morton Devonshire^Yo 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel? I will remove this statement also for the time being. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Pearl&curid=202851&diff=88482338&oldid=88427320] Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? [[User:Seabhcan|Lord Seabhcán of Baloney]] 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 :First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight.  Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD.  Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Wikipedia to make ad hominem attacks.  I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective.  Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me.  Thank you.  [[Image:Matt_Devonshire2.jpg|20px]]<font size=2><font color="Blue">[[User:Morton_devonshire|'''Morton Devonshire''']]</font></font>[[User talk:Morton_devonshire|<i><sup><font color="Red">Yo</font></sup></i>]] 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
+::You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel?  I will remove this statement also for the time being. [[User:Seabhcan|Lord Seabhcán of Baloney]] 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)