Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 January 14: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Dianne Morales: ce |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====[[:Dianne Morales]]==== |
====[[:Dianne Morales]]==== |
||
:{{DRV links|Dianne Morales|xfd_page=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dianne_Morales|article=}} |
:{{DRV links|Dianne Morales|xfd_page=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dianne_Morales|article=}} |
||
The prior redirect result was proper at the time, as the subject did not then satisfy GNG. However, in the ensuing months, coverage has been such as to result in the subject now meeting GNG. Thus, significant new information justifies recreating the deleted page--but in the form seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dianne_Morales&diff=1000017728&oldid=999893251 here] |
The prior redirect result was proper at the time, as the subject did not then satisfy GNG. However, in the ensuing months, coverage has been such as to result in the subject now meeting GNG. |
||
Thus, significant new information justifies recreating the deleted page--but in the form seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dianne_Morales&diff=1000017728&oldid=999893251 here]. Which reflects the many RS articles devoted to coverage of the subject of the article. The subject has now received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.; [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:2143:8500:7913:1C16:7EF2:49A9|2603:7000:2143:8500:7913:1C16:7EF2:49A9]] ([[User talk:2603:7000:2143:8500:7913:1C16:7EF2:49A9|talk]]) 00:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[:NIDA (political party)]] (closed) ==== |
==== [[:NIDA (political party)]] (closed) ==== |
||
Revision as of 00:31, 15 January 2021
The prior redirect result was proper at the time, as the subject did not then satisfy GNG. However, in the ensuing months, coverage has been such as to result in the subject now meeting GNG.
Thus, significant new information justifies recreating the deleted page--but in the form seen here. Which reflects the many RS articles devoted to coverage of the subject of the article. The subject has now received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.; 2603:7000:2143:8500:7913:1C16:7EF2:49A9 (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
NIDA (political party) (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
This article was speedily deleted under criterion G5, but I think it was a useful article that shouldn't have been deleted. Moreover, G5 may not apply: the sockpuppet was not used to evade a block, as the primary account was not blocked at the time of creation of the article. Criterion G5 specifically states that "to qualify, the edit or page must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked" and that "a page created before the ban or block was imposed (...) will not qualify under this criterion". ― Ætoms [talk] 14:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
