Talk:Swiffer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:11, 16 May 2021

Brands Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Start‑class Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

MSDS

http://www.pg.com/content/pdf/01_about_pg/msds/fabric_and_homecare/household_cleaners/Swiffer_Wet_Jet_Antibacterial_Cleaner.pdf;jsessionid=4BPTL3LGMMQAVQFIASJHKY4AVACJE3MK

After a cursory search on google, i don't see any links that claim swiffer and the ingredients in them contribute to harmful bacteria resistance. --75.20.207.36 (talk) 06:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"This line of products is known for being more efficient than conventional alternatives. Swiffer products use less material than it's predecessors." - removed as advertising. Can any of this be backed up? Known by whom? Secretlondon 00:56, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Razor blade model?

I'm not so sure about that. The basic mop seems reasonably priced at USD$10. The SwifferVac is hardly cheap at USD$35. --24.249.108.133 22:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Swiffer Sweep + Vac is now $55 ($54.95 MSRP on http://swiffer.com/en-us/shop-products/sweeping/swiffer-sweepervac-cordless-vacuum-starter-kit ), why is it not in the article as a current product? The article makes it sound like it was renamed to "Swiffer Sweep and Trap" and there's no vacuum any more which is not true, they're two separate products and I don't think the vacuum was ever discontinued, just renamed from "Swiffer SweeperVac" to "Swiffer Sweep + Vac" (I have the old vacuum with the old name). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.172.60.124 (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pads can also be used between different brands of 'mop' - Swiffer or otherwise. Myself, I use Target's O-Mop but find the 'biodegradable' pads a little lacking on the cleaning power - doesn't help the environment if I fill the trash can with more of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.25.17.169 (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental Concerns

Would the Environmental Concerns be original research, or is there someone who acknowledged that fact? Allmightyduck (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research?

There is a lot of wording that is not properly sourced (i.e. Amazon product pages, which are not reliable sources) or not sourced at all. While the info is well written and mostly accurate AFAIK, there should be more cites to back it up. NinLEGWho (talk) 06:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:10, 16 May 2021 edit VarhOuh (talk \| contribs) 68 edits →‎Original Research?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:11, 16 May 2021 edit undo VarhOuh (talk \| contribs) 68 edits m "Info is informative" was a bit redundant. Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== Original Research? ==		== Original Research? ==

	There is a lot of wording that is not properly sourced (i.e. Amazon product pages, which are not reliable sources) or not sourced at all. While the info is ~~informative~~ and mostly accurate AFAIK, there should be more cites to back it up. [[User:VarhOuh\|NinLEGWho]] ([[User talk:VarhOuh\|talk]]) 06:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)		There is a lot of wording that is not properly sourced (i.e. Amazon product pages, which are not reliable sources) or not sourced at all. While the info is well written and mostly accurate AFAIK, there should be more cites to back it up. [[User:VarhOuh\|NinLEGWho]] ([[User talk:VarhOuh\|talk]]) 06:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)