Talk:Telegram & Gazette: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Worcester Telegram & Gazette to Talk:Telegram & Gazette: per move request; see talk page for details |
closing RM discussion; page moved |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{move|Telegram & Gazette}} |
|||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move == |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 04:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<hr/> |
|||
[[Worcester Telegram & Gazette]] → [[Telegram & Gazette]] — The name on the front page, and in the masthead, is "Telegram & Gazette." "Worcester" is simply the name of the city it covers. Compare [[The Times]] (''not'' "The London Times"). Obviously the current page should be kept as a redirect. [[User:Wiki Wistah|Wiki Wistah]] 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
[[Worcester Telegram & Gazette]] → [[Telegram & Gazette]] — The name on the front page, and in the masthead, is "Telegram & Gazette." "Worcester" is simply the name of the city it covers. Compare [[The Times]] (''not'' "The London Times"). Obviously the current page should be kept as a redirect. [[User:Wiki Wistah|Wiki Wistah]] 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
A little more background here ... I'm a subscriber and read this newspaper every morning. Now that I think about it, my previous statement (in the edit history) that it's been the plain old ''Telegram & Gazette'' "since 1989" may be wrong. I vaguely recall that before the nameplate was redesigned, which was either in [[2004]] or [[2005]], if memory serves, it did say "Worcester" above the word "Telegram," in smaller font, in the same place where the date is now printed. And the company name -- the specific division of NYT Co. that publishes the T & G -- ''is'' "Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp." But my point stands: the paper currently does not, in either the A1 nameplate nor the opinion page masthead, call itself the ''<strike>Worcester</strike> Telegram & Gazette'' (nor, for that matter, the ''<strike>Worcester</strike> Sunday Telegram''). [[User:Wiki Wistah|Wiki Wistah]] 01:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
A little more background here ... I'm a subscriber and read this newspaper every morning. Now that I think about it, my previous statement (in the edit history) that it's been the plain old ''Telegram & Gazette'' "since 1989" may be wrong. I vaguely recall that before the nameplate was redesigned, which was either in [[2004]] or [[2005]], if memory serves, it did say "Worcester" above the word "Telegram," in smaller font, in the same place where the date is now printed. And the company name -- the specific division of NYT Co. that publishes the T & G -- ''is'' "Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp." But my point stands: the paper currently does not, in either the A1 nameplate nor the opinion page masthead, call itself the ''<strike>Worcester</strike> Telegram & Gazette'' (nor, for that matter, the ''<strike>Worcester</strike> Sunday Telegram''). [[User:Wiki Wistah|Wiki Wistah]] 01:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
[[User:Wiki Wistah|Wiki Wistah]] 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
|||
Revision as of 04:26, 24 January 2007
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 04:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Worcester Telegram & Gazette → Telegram & Gazette — The name on the front page, and in the masthead, is "Telegram & Gazette." "Worcester" is simply the name of the city it covers. Compare The Times (not "The London Times"). Obviously the current page should be kept as a redirect. Wiki Wistah 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Survey - in support of the move
- Support per nom. Patstuarttalk|edits 09:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey - in opposition to the move
Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
A little more background here ... I'm a subscriber and read this newspaper every morning. Now that I think about it, my previous statement (in the edit history) that it's been the plain old Telegram & Gazette "since 1989" may be wrong. I vaguely recall that before the nameplate was redesigned, which was either in 2004 or 2005, if memory serves, it did say "Worcester" above the word "Telegram," in smaller font, in the same place where the date is now printed. And the company name -- the specific division of NYT Co. that publishes the T & G -- is "Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp." But my point stands: the paper currently does not, in either the A1 nameplate nor the opinion page masthead, call itself the Worcester Telegram & Gazette (nor, for that matter, the Worcester Sunday Telegram). Wiki Wistah 01:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Wistah 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.