Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Pyrenees Mountain Dog 2.png: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HeartSpoon (talk | contribs) |
HeartSpoon (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
**** But if you look BEFORE those couple of months this year, it's about 9 consecutive years. The point is, this is not a new image. [[User:HeartSpoon|HeartSpoon]] ([[User talk:HeartSpoon|talk]]) |
**** But if you look BEFORE those couple of months this year, it's about 9 consecutive years. The point is, this is not a new image. [[User:HeartSpoon|HeartSpoon]] ([[User talk:HeartSpoon|talk]]) |
||
* '''Oppose''' poor composition. [[User:Charlesjsharp|Charlesjsharp]] ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|talk]]) 08:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' poor composition. [[User:Charlesjsharp|Charlesjsharp]] ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|talk]]) 08:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
**For my education only, how is this poorly composed, say, to the turkey above it? --[[User:HeartSpoon|HeartSpoon]] ([[User talk:HeartSpoon|talk]]) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
Revision as of 11:44, 28 June 2021
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2021 at 15:31:31 (UTC)
- Reason
- New Good Article. Photo has high EV. Clearly portrays characteristic features of the pure-bred breed: white with "badger" coloring, double dews claws on hind legs, "pantaloon" hind legs, "shepherd's crook" tail, etc. New .png upload from previous .jpg with higher resolution and adjusted image contrast.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pyrenean Mountain Dog
- FP Category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- HeartSpoon (talk)
- Support as nominator – HeartSpoon (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose until requirements resolved. - Ineligible. Reason: Added to the article today. --Janke | Talk 16:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- This image has been at the head of the article for 9 years (please verify for yoursef). Upload today was just to increase resolution which was the point of contention when this image was presented for POTD in 2012. See FP criterion #5. Please consider revoting on this basis. --HeartSpoon (talk)
- The image hasn't been in the infobox continuously for 9 years - in fact, May 10th to June 26 it wasn't in the article at all, and currently, it's not. I'll let others decide if that makes it ineligible or not. (Added proviso to my oppose above. There's an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page: [[1]]) --Janke | Talk 07:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- But if you look BEFORE those couple of months this year, it's about 9 consecutive years. The point is, this is not a new image. HeartSpoon (talk)
- The image hasn't been in the infobox continuously for 9 years - in fact, May 10th to June 26 it wasn't in the article at all, and currently, it's not. I'll let others decide if that makes it ineligible or not. (Added proviso to my oppose above. There's an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page: [[1]]) --Janke | Talk 07:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- This image has been at the head of the article for 9 years (please verify for yoursef). Upload today was just to increase resolution which was the point of contention when this image was presented for POTD in 2012. See FP criterion #5. Please consider revoting on this basis. --HeartSpoon (talk)
- Oppose poor composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- For my education only, how is this poorly composed, say, to the turkey above it? --HeartSpoon (talk)
