Talk:Wenceslaus II of Bohemia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:01, 3 February 2007

After a few moves without discussion, we have "Venceslaus II of Bohemia, Wenceslaus II Premyslid ...", while his son is listed under "Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, Wenceslaus III Premyslid ...". How about consistency? -- Matthead ^discuß! O 23:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question re early 15th C. Wenceslas

According to a couple of books I read recently on the Teutonic Order and the 1410 Battle of Tannenberg (Grunwald / Zirgalis), there was a King Wenceslas, or Wenceslaus, of Bohemia who attempted to mediate between the Teutonic Order and the King of Poland in 1409. I don't find this personage on the disambugation list. What's up?

Sca 15:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This would have been probably Wenceslaus IV (1361-1419). You possibly can't find him because he wasn't a member of the Premyslid dynasty (which died out with Wenceslaus III), he was from the House of Luxembourg. Sapphire1000 23. January 2007

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this moved? Wenceslaus is the English spelling and the ducal articles conform to it. Srnec 23:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support per WP:UE. — AjaxSmack 02:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wenceslaus is the English form. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{moveto|Wenceslaus II of Bohemia}}
 After a few moves without discussion, we have "Venceslaus II of Bohemia, Wenceslaus II Premyslid ...", while his son is listed under "Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, Wenceslaus III Premyslid ...". How about consistency? --&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<sup>discuß!</sup>]]&nbsp;[[EU|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;">&nbsp;&nbsp;O&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]&nbsp; 23:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 10: / Line 9: @@
 ==Requested move==
+<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
+{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
+<hr/>
 Why was this moved? Wenceslaus is the English spelling and the ducal articles conform to it. [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] 23:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 === Survey ===
@@ Line 15: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Support''' per [[WP:UE]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">'''&nbsp;AjaxSmack&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span>   02:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' ''Wenceslaus'' is the English form. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 23:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->