Jump to content

User:Tpkatsa: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tpkatsa (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tpkatsa (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I do not respond to nor am I notified on responses to edits. I do not generally monitor or respond to feedback. To those who have thanked me for edits, you're welcome.
I do not respond to nor am I notified on responses to edits. I do not generally monitor or respond to feedback. To those who have thanked me for edits, you're welcome.


While it is a significant collaborative and informative effort, Wikipedia is not a scholarly or academic reference. Wikipedia is more properly regarded as "infotainment," tending to be less reliable the more controversial the subject.
While it is a significant collaborative and informative effort, Wikipedia is by no means a scholarly or academic reference. Wikipedia is more properly regarded as "infotainment," tending to be less reliable the more controversial the subject.


Over the years, and contrary to the [https://ballotpedia.org/Why_Neutrality vision of its co-founder Larry Sanger], Wikipedia has become left-wing, instead of neutral in its presentations. For this reason, I recommend https://www.ballotpedia.org or https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org
Over the years, and contrary to the [https://ballotpedia.org/Why_Neutrality vision of its co-founder Larry Sanger], Wikipedia has become left-wing, instead of neutral in its presentations. For this reason, I recommend https://www.ballotpedia.org or https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org

Revision as of 14:12, 9 November 2021

I occasionally will make an article edit or comment on a talk page if I feel strongly about an issue or how it is presented. I tend to restrict article edits to correcting obvious errors of fact; otherwise I will usually comment on the talk pages.

I do not respond to nor am I notified on responses to edits. I do not generally monitor or respond to feedback. To those who have thanked me for edits, you're welcome.

While it is a significant collaborative and informative effort, Wikipedia is by no means a scholarly or academic reference. Wikipedia is more properly regarded as "infotainment," tending to be less reliable the more controversial the subject.

Over the years, and contrary to the vision of its co-founder Larry Sanger, Wikipedia has become left-wing, instead of neutral in its presentations. For this reason, I recommend https://www.ballotpedia.org or https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org

Tpkatsa (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)