Jump to content

User talk:Mikemiddleton: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yuut (talk | contribs)
m Added AfD Shadowclan nomination for clarity.
Line 3: Line 3:


Yuut your a sockpuppet for Shadowclan, thanks and good bye. [[User:Mikemiddleton|Mikemiddleton]] 15:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Yuut your a sockpuppet for Shadowclan, thanks and good bye. [[User:Mikemiddleton|Mikemiddleton]] 15:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)



==AfD nomination of [[Blake Van Leer]]==
An editor has nominated [[Blake Van Leer]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Blake Van Leer (2nd nomination) | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Van Leer (2nd nomination)]] | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Van Leer]] }} and please be sure to [[WP:SIGN|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. [[User:Jayden54Bot|Jayden54Bot]] 21:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

: [[Blake Van Leer]] was assessed by the community and considered to be non-notable. Therefore please stop adding a link to that page in [[Van Leer]]. Disambiguation pages for names are not indiscriminate lists of people, they are tools to navigate to articles that we have on notable people. The fact that you are close to getting a block for violating [[WP:3RR]] notwithstanding, please consider this a warning to stop recreating deleted material. Thank you. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 22:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

:: This is your final warning. If you continue to replace links to deleted material you will be blocked from editing (and reverting from your IP address will not work either). Please let this one go. Thank you. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 18:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

::: Editing from an IP will not avoid a block, as a [[WP:CHECK]] can easily confirm that the same person made both edits. Now you know that, be aware that any more such disruptive edits from any account or IP will result in all your accounts being blocked. This action will occur without any further warnings, so please consider very carefully whether you wish to continue along these lines. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 21:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|30px|left]] You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:24hrs|a period of 24hrs|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:disruptive editing|disruptive editing|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your '''[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]]''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> .</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 23:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 8 February 2007

AfD nomination of Shadowclan

The Shadowclan article conforms to all four policies required for a valid Wikipedia article: (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:No original research) and the copyright policy (Wikipedia:Copyrights). I urge you to (re)read the debate and administrative decision of the last two afd discussions before attempting another one. If you still believe that the article should be nominated for a third afd tag based on the same "not-notable" argument, please follow the proper procedures (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion) for nominating an article for deletion. Note that abuse of the deletion process, vandalism, sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry are not tolerated. Yuut 03:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yuut your a sockpuppet for Shadowclan, thanks and good bye. Mikemiddleton 15:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]