Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyte: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bcat (talk | contribs)
Bcat (talk | contribs)
→‎[[Jyte]]: See also the talk page
Line 3: Line 3:
:{{la|Jyte}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyte|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 9#{{anchorencode:Jyte}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|Jyte}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyte|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 9#{{anchorencode:Jyte}}|View log]])</noinclude>
[[WP:WEB|Non-notable website]]. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 17:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[[WP:WEB|Non-notable website]]. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 17:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
:Well, I haven't edited here for a while, so I'm not sure if I'm eligible to vote. If I am, I'll have to say '''keep'''. 1942 claims have been made on the site in a couple weeks after it was launched. Though the user community is small, it is pretty active. — [[User:Bcat|<span style="color: #0a0;">Bcat</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bcat|<span style="color: #00a;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Emailuser/Bcat|<span style="color: #00a;">email</span>]])</sup> 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
:Well, I haven't edited here for a while, so I'm not sure if I'm eligible to vote. If I am, I'll have to say '''keep'''. 1942 claims have been made on the site in a couple weeks after it was launched. Though the user community is small, it is pretty active. See the article's talk page for a bit more information. — [[User:Bcat|<span style="color: #0a0;">Bcat</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bcat|<span style="color: #00a;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Emailuser/Bcat|<span style="color: #00a;">email</span>]])</sup> 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 9 February 2007

Jyte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable website. Veinor (talk to me) 17:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I haven't edited here for a while, so I'm not sure if I'm eligible to vote. If I am, I'll have to say keep. 1942 claims have been made on the site in a couple weeks after it was launched. Though the user community is small, it is pretty active. See the article's talk page for a bit more information. — Bcat (talkemail) 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]