Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Santa Maria delle Grazie, Brescia: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Support |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* Thanks for your support. To tell the truth its not intentionally "rubbed out", but a motion artifact during long exposure --[[User:Moroder|Moroder]] ([[User talk:Moroder|talk]]) 20:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC) |
:* Thanks for your support. To tell the truth its not intentionally "rubbed out", but a motion artifact during long exposure --[[User:Moroder|Moroder]] ([[User talk:Moroder|talk]]) 20:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support'''. Stunning. I presume quite dimly lit, so the long exposure was a good choice. Just to note, you know you are allowed to vote on your own work, [[User:Moroder|Moroder]]? Don't want you to feel excluded. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.6% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 16:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Support'''. Stunning. I presume quite dimly lit, so the long exposure was a good choice. Just to note, you know you are allowed to vote on your own work, [[User:Moroder|Moroder]]? Don't want you to feel excluded. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.6% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 16:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
: * '''Support''' Well then ''double support'' ;-)--[[User:Moroder|Moroder]] ([[User talk:Moroder|talk]]) 22:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' – [[User:Bammesk|Bammesk]] ([[User talk:Bammesk|talk]]) 02:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' – [[User:Bammesk|Bammesk]] ([[User talk:Bammesk|talk]]) 02:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support''' Excellent image of the dimly-lit interior. Good EV. --[[User:Tagooty|Tagooty]] ([[User talk:Tagooty|talk]]) 04:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' Excellent image of the dimly-lit interior. Good EV. --[[User:Tagooty|Tagooty]] ([[User talk:Tagooty|talk]]) 04:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:02, 14 February 2022
Santa Maria delle Grazie, Brescia
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2022 at 17:50:22 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Santuario_di_Santa_Maria_delle_Grazie_interno_Brescia.jpg/519px-Santuario_di_Santa_Maria_delle_Grazie_interno_Brescia.jpg)
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Santa Maria delle Grazie, Brescia
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Creator
- Wolfgang Moroder
- Support as nominator – MER-C 17:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support I don't like the rubbed out face but no one Commons seemed to mind. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your support. To tell the truth its not intentionally "rubbed out", but a motion artifact during long exposure --Moroder (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Stunning. I presume quite dimly lit, so the long exposure was a good choice. Just to note, you know you are allowed to vote on your own work, Moroder? Don't want you to feel excluded. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 16:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- * Support Well then double support ;-)--Moroder (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Excellent image of the dimly-lit interior. Good EV. --Tagooty (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - DreamSparrow Chat 16:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)