Talk:Pure Romance: Difference between revisions
Elaborate on contradicting/confusing parts of history |
→Contradiction/Confusion: Snipped my sig for length (as displayed on page only, wikilink targets left as-is) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Full disclosure, I’ve been scatterbrained all day. On a good day I might have needed a second look, but not a third or fourth! X-D |
Full disclosure, I’ve been scatterbrained all day. On a good day I might have needed a second look, but not a third or fourth! X-D |
||
– |
– [[Special:Contributions/2600:1001:B101:D5A2:3566:545F:249A:F6E|2600:1001:B101:[snip]]] ([[User talk:2600:1001:B101:D5A2:3566:545F:249A:F6E|talk]]) 00:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:47, 16 April 2022
Contradiction/Confusion
They appears to be contradictory – or least, confusing – info about the history of the company’s name and acquisition of other companies. As it stands, it says the company was founded as Slumber Parties, changed its name to Pure Romance, and then later acquired Slumber Parties.
After flagging the section, I noticed that the two Slumber Parties were based in different states. So I’d guess that they were unrelated prior to the acquisition. But given the high degree of similarity overall (same names, same types of products, both mlms) a brief clarification would be helpful. (Technically I’m just guessing, so I’ll leave it for someone who knows the actual facts.)
Full disclosure, I’ve been scatterbrained all day. On a good day I might have needed a second look, but not a third or fourth! X-D