Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sö 113: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Spongie555 (talk | contribs) |
Spongie555 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
***There were quite a few black spots too. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 15:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
***There were quite a few black spots too. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 15:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
****{{ping|MER-C}} Went over and did a full pass of the image. That should have gotten it. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.8% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 19:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
****{{ping|MER-C}} Went over and did a full pass of the image. That should have gotten it. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.8% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 19:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
*''' |
*'''Support''' High quality and high ev. [[User:Spongie555|Spongie555]] ([[User talk:Spongie555|talk]]) 05:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
Revision as of 05:05, 22 May 2022
Södermanland Runic Inscription 113
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
- Reason
- I think this is a fine image. High quality, attractive background, and rather easier to read than the modern photograph.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Södermanland Runic Inscription 113, Otto von Friesen
- FP category for this image
- It doesn't have an obvious category. Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others? Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture?
- Creator
- Otto von Friesen, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 22:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support quality (t · c) buidhe 03:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support. There's some damage still remaining in the grass on the left side about 85% of the way down. MER-C 18:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- The black scratch? Got it. Sorry, that grass does my head in a bit when I was looking for damage in it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- There were quite a few black spots too. MER-C 15:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- @MER-C: Went over and did a full pass of the image. That should have gotten it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 19:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- There were quite a few black spots too. MER-C 15:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- The black scratch? Got it. Sorry, that grass does my head in a bit when I was looking for damage in it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support High quality and high ev. Spongie555 (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)