Talk:Controversial literature (Library of Congress Subject Headings): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Last one was Better: disclaimer |
BigFrank100 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:For anyone considering taking the above opinion seriously, see [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X]]. [[User:Pbryan|pbryan]] 19:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC) |
:For anyone considering taking the above opinion seriously, see [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X]]. [[User:Pbryan|pbryan]] 19:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Ok seriously, no offense, but your fucking doush with nothing better to do or contribut. All you seem to do is harras me and [[User:Tony360X|Tony360X]] cause your probly boning the new guy who wrote this page. So do something for useful or shut the hell up you fucking wine-o. – [[User:BigFrank100|BingFrank100]] |
Revision as of 05:41, 18 February 2007
Last one was Better
No offense but this version of the Controversial literature article is just awful and I have to question the writers refrense. Tony360X's version of Controversial literature article was much better and more useful. All this guy did was got a good thing deleted just so he can put unessary crap as a replacment. - BigFrank100
- For anyone considering taking the above opinion seriously, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X and Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X. pbryan 19:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok seriously, no offense, but your fucking doush with nothing better to do or contribut. All you seem to do is harras me and Tony360X cause your probly boning the new guy who wrote this page. So do something for useful or shut the hell up you fucking wine-o. – BingFrank100