Jump to content

Talk:W34 (nuclear warhead): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPMILHIST|class=stub|Russian=yes|Weaponry=yes}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=stub|Russian=yes|Weaponry=yes}}

== Development time mismatch ==

The article's current first sentence tells, that the W34 was '''developed''' and deployed during the mid-60ies, but further on are three different applications of that warhead listed, each of them with a production start in 1958?

So the production of the (only) three devices using a W34 warhead had started '''about five years prior''' to it's very self development? Sounds quite improbable to me, really very improbable. Should that really be true, it thus would be a very interesting fact begging to be explicitly stated (and maybe explained in further detail) for carification. --[[Special:Contributions/213.142.97.249|213.142.97.249]] ([[User talk:213.142.97.249|talk]]) 23:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:14, 17 June 2022

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Development time mismatch

The article's current first sentence tells, that the W34 was developed and deployed during the mid-60ies, but further on are three different applications of that warhead listed, each of them with a production start in 1958?

So the production of the (only) three devices using a W34 warhead had started about five years prior to it's very self development? Sounds quite improbable to me, really very improbable. Should that really be true, it thus would be a very interesting fact begging to be explicitly stated (and maybe explained in further detail) for carification. --213.142.97.249 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]