Talk:CMSimple: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:04, 20 February 2007

Notability argument

Keep: Wikipedia has many more articles whose subject matter is absolutely useless which are likely to stay around forever. I, for one, consider this software very useful, and a good example of the increasingly-used CMS type of software, and believe the article should be kept. --Super Jamie 09:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:03, 20 February 2007 edit 203.206.60.203 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:04, 20 February 2007 edit undo Super Jamie (talk \| contribs) 95 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Notability argument ==		== Notability argument ==

	'''Keep:''' Wikipedia has many more articles whose subject matter is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queens_Park_railway_station%2C_Perth ~~Absolutely~~ useless] which are likely to stay around forever. I, for one, consider this software very useful, and a good example of the increasingly-used CMS type of software, and believe the article should be kept. --[[User:~~203.206.60.203~~\|~~203.206.60.203~~]] 09:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)		'''Keep:''' Wikipedia has many more articles whose subject matter is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queens_Park_railway_station%2C_Perth absolutely useless] which are likely to stay around forever. I, for one, consider this software very useful, and a good example of the increasingly-used CMS type of software, and believe the article should be kept. --[[User:Super Jamie\|Super Jamie]] 09:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)