Jump to content

User:Whiteguru/John Ratcliff (bookbinder): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
/sandbox/ in progress
/sandbox/ in progress
Line 116: Line 116:
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
:::* Later Englishman Ratcliff ... my sense is ''Englishman'' is superfluous.
:::*
:::* Unsure what the bullet point linking Holmes, "Collection of tracts" is present for.
:::* underneath the second gallery is a link to Increase Mather 1670–80 → this is for ?
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}

Revision as of 01:14, 27 June 2022


GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

  • Hello Doug Coldwell, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Assessment

  1. Comprehension:
  2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (b) (MoS) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
  3. Verifiability:
  4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (c) (original research) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness:
  6. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (b) (focused) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
  7. Neutrality:
  8. Notes Result
    The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
  9. Stability:
  10. Notes Result
    The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
  11. Illustration:
  12. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) The reviewer has left no comments here Neutral Undetermined

 


  • Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [Talk page]. Review is taken over.

 

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

 


 

Observations

Document statistics

  • HTML document size: 92 kB
  • Prose size (including all HTML code): 9536 B
  • References (including all HTML code): 21 kB
  • Wiki text: 15 kB
  • Prose size (text only): 5629 B (961 words) "readable prose size" as per WP:SIZERULE
  • References (text only): 2808 B

Page Information

  • Page views in the past 30 days = 128
  • 90 day page views = 420, daily average = 5 views
  • Date of page creation = 10:21, 16 December 2006
  • Date of latest edit = 07:10, 24 June 2022
  • Total number of edits = 77 by 33 editors
  • Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2013 ...
  • Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted
  • Internet Archive Bot has made 6 edits to this article.

Images

  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 6B.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 1.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 3.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 4.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 5.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
  • File:General Lawes and Libertyes, Massachusetts 1660.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Bay Psalm Book 1651.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:New England Memoriall 1669.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Sewall's Commonplace Book.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Call From Heaven 1679 cover.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • Images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales; Images have appropriate use with suitable captions
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • Later Englishman Ratcliff ... my sense is Englishman is superfluous.
  • Unsure what the bullet point linking Holmes, "Collection of tracts" is present for.
  • underneath the second gallery is a link to Increase Mather 1670–80 → this is for ?
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  1. Overall: