User:Yakuman: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
|}<includeonly>{{{cats|[[Category:Wikipedians who are not currently active|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}}</includeonly><noinclude></noinclude>
<includeonly>{{{cats|[[Category:Wikipedians who are not currently active|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}}</includeonly><noinclude></noinclude>


Long before the Web, Lewis Mumford predicted that the explosion of information could "''bring about a state of intellectual enervation and depletion hardly to be distinguished from massive ignorance''." Not only would lots of information fail to make us smarter; it would actually make us dumber by overwhelming us. The solution, he thought, was not to be found in technology alone but in "a reassertion of human selectivity and moral self-discipline, leading to continent productivity." In these days of information incontinence, in order to be part of the solution rather than the problem, I think it is important to remember this. --Dale Hoiberg, editor in chief of ''Encyclopaedia Britannica''.
Long before the Web, Lewis Mumford predicted that the explosion of information could "''bring about a state of intellectual enervation and depletion hardly to be distinguished from massive ignorance''." Not only would lots of information fail to make us smarter; it would actually make us dumber by overwhelming us. The solution, he thought, was not to be found in technology alone but in "a reassertion of human selectivity and moral self-discipline, leading to continent productivity." In these days of information incontinence, in order to be part of the solution rather than the problem, I think it is important to remember this. --Dale Hoiberg, editor in chief of ''Encyclopaedia Britannica''.


Wikipedia's policy and structure are an anarcho-tyranny: “law without order, a constant busybodying about behavior that does not at all derive from a shared moral consensus." As Thomas Fleming also noted, "a world made safe for democracy is a world in which no one dares to raise his voice for fear that mommy will put you away some place where you can be re-educated."
Wikipedia's policy and structure are an anarcho-tyranny: “law without order, a constant busybodying about behavior that does not at all derive from a shared moral consensus." As Thomas Fleming also noted, "a world made safe for democracy is a world in which no one dares to raise his voice for fear that mommy will put you away someplace where you can be re-educated."


Wikipedia’s systemic bias is toward decadent postmodernity, technocracy, and a half-educated New Class universalism. An editor is a nameless, atomized individual, stripped of dignity and honour, but held together by petty tolerance, superficial fairness and false decency. He is expected to be without any authority or principles outside himself, save for occasional high-flown humanitarian sentiments.
Wikipedia’s systemic bias is toward decadent postmodernity, technocracy, and a half-educated New Class universalism. An editor is a nameless, atomized individual, stripped of dignity and honour but held together by petty tolerance, superficial fairness, and false decency. He is expected to be without any authority or principles outside himself, save for occasional high-flown humanitarian sentiments.


Without the moral, cultural and spiritual means to process knowledge, this disconnected volunteer marches under a banner of false tolerance, contrived decency, and shallow dilettantism, He donates his effort to a hypocritical parliament of parasitic pseudo-elites, who efforts subtly point the masses toward nihilism, dedicated consumerism, and irrational scientism, all under the flag of freedom, technology and community. Shape without form, shade without colour, paralysed force, gesture without motion.
Without the moral, cultural, and spiritual means to process knowledge, this disconnected volunteer marches under a banner of false tolerance, contrived decency, and shallow dilettantism; he donates his effort to a hypocritical parliament of parasitic pseudo-elites, whose efforts subtly point the masses toward nihilism, dedicated consumerism, and irrational scientism, all under the flag of freedom, technology, and community—shape without form, shade without colour, paralysed force, gesture without motion.


'''Disclaimer:''' My dealings are entirely circumspect and proper. I am already familiar with Wikipedia policy, including [[WP:A]], [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]]. If people send me warnings, treats, accusations or insults, it bothers me, especially when they are false. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity and ask for the right to respond in kind to any post. I am not active in any political party or public policy organization. Please do not assume that my edits represent an agenda. I am committed to maintaining a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] in ''all'' articles I edit. I prefer to avoid debates about manipulable policy documents, especially considering [[WP:IAR]] and what I read on [http://wikipediareview.com Wikipedia Review], [http://www.wikitruth.info Wikitruth] and other outside sites. I reserve the right to update this notice without notice. All such updates are retroactive to my registration in 2005. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any of my rights or remedies, all of which are hereby expressly reserved. Yakuman
'''Disclaimer:''' My dealings are entirely circumspect and proper. I am already familiar with Wikipedia policy, including [[WP:A]], [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]]. It bothers me if people send me warnings, treats, accusations or insults, especially when they are false. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity and ask for the right to respond in kind to any post. I am not active in any political party or public policy organization. Please do not assume that my edits represent an agenda. I am committed to maintaining a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] in ''all'' articles I edit. I prefer to avoid debates about manipulable policy documents, especially considering [[WP:IAR]] and what I read on [http://wikipediareview.com Wikipedia Review], [http://www.wikitruth.info Wikitruth] and other outside sites. I reserve the right to update this notice without notice. All such updates are retroactive to my registration in 2005. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any of my rights or remedies, which are hereby expressly reserved. Yakuman
<div style="float: left; border:solid slategray 1px; margin: 1px;">
<div style="float: left; border:solid slategray 1px; margin: 1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: white;"
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: white;"

Revision as of 03:38, 28 July 2022


Long before the Web, Lewis Mumford predicted that the explosion of information could "bring about a state of intellectual enervation and depletion hardly to be distinguished from massive ignorance." Not only would lots of information fail to make us smarter; it would actually make us dumber by overwhelming us. The solution, he thought, was not to be found in technology alone but in "a reassertion of human selectivity and moral self-discipline, leading to continent productivity." In these days of information incontinence, in order to be part of the solution rather than the problem, I think it is important to remember this. --Dale Hoiberg, editor in chief of Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Wikipedia's policy and structure are an anarcho-tyranny: “law without order, a constant busybodying about behavior that does not at all derive from a shared moral consensus." As Thomas Fleming also noted, "a world made safe for democracy is a world in which no one dares to raise his voice for fear that mommy will put you away someplace where you can be re-educated."

Wikipedia’s systemic bias is toward decadent postmodernity, technocracy, and a half-educated New Class universalism. An editor is a nameless, atomized individual, stripped of dignity and honour but held together by petty tolerance, superficial fairness, and false decency. He is expected to be without any authority or principles outside himself, save for occasional high-flown humanitarian sentiments.

Without the moral, cultural, and spiritual means to process knowledge, this disconnected volunteer marches under a banner of false tolerance, contrived decency, and shallow dilettantism; he donates his effort to a hypocritical parliament of parasitic pseudo-elites, whose efforts subtly point the masses toward nihilism, dedicated consumerism, and irrational scientism, all under the flag of freedom, technology, and community—shape without form, shade without colour, paralysed force, gesture without motion.

Disclaimer: My dealings are entirely circumspect and proper. I am already familiar with Wikipedia policy, including WP:A, WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. It bothers me if people send me warnings, treats, accusations or insults, especially when they are false. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity and ask for the right to respond in kind to any post. I am not active in any political party or public policy organization. Please do not assume that my edits represent an agenda. I am committed to maintaining a neutral point of view in all articles I edit. I prefer to avoid debates about manipulable policy documents, especially considering WP:IAR and what I read on Wikipedia Review, Wikitruth and other outside sites. I reserve the right to update this notice without notice. All such updates are retroactive to my registration in 2005. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any of my rights or remedies, which are hereby expressly reserved. Yakuman

This user has unpopular religious beliefs.
This user has unpopular political beliefs.
TRVTH This user lives not by lies.