Jump to content

User talk:WATP: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bobscot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Bobscot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:


original sources cited on 11th january so whats the problem
original sources cited on 11th january so whats the problem

www.highbeamresearch.com or findarticles.com both have detailed information on all the points added

Revision as of 21:54, 26 February 2007

Archive

Archives


1

I am a new popup user and I can't figure out how to do instant reverts. Would you be so kind to clue me in?Scottydude 22:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. I really appreciate it.

Nicknames

I am trying to discuss the topic of nicknames for Rangers fc and I keep having my comments removed by another user.

Can you help ?

I see that you do have a barnstar for 'crossing the OF divide'

I wanted to discuss the possibility of adding some other common nicknames to the page Rangers FC but instead of just applying them I thought it would be proper to discuss them first. However, one user will not let me even discuss them as he personally does not like the nicknames that I am refering to.

Should other users not have their say before things are added/deleted?

Should one member be aloud to decide what should and should not be topic for discussion on a talk page?

Hope you can help, thanks!

ps User is using pop-up software.

Hello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 03:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAID 18-25 February

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Birmingham City F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Stuart McCall, Andy Goram and Richard Gough

Can you please explain why you edited out the pieces on Stuart McCall, Andy Goram and Richard Gough? Is it not fact that they chose not to play for the country in which they were born?

The point about McCall 'turning his back on the land of his birth' is factual, yet you have changed this to 'his heart eventually overcame his head, and he switched to Scotland.' There is no citation for this and it is pure speculation. There's no need to let the truth get in the way of a good story though, as we've found before with your amendments to 'History of Rangers FC.'

As for your assertion that the changes were badly worded, don't be so silly. If you can't find a proper reason to delete something I have written, don't insult my intelligence by denouncing my considerably superior linguistic skills. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaitch Trinita (talkcontribs)

Celtic F.C. Notable players

Why did you change the celtic noteable palyers page after a edited it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam D1 (talkcontribs)

Removal of famous fans

There are a lot of policies flying about. Could we have a link please, that'd be reet nice. (Quentin X 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ally McCoist

how is the material unsourced it it had verifiable sources in the original edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talkcontribs)

why is my editing unsourced the original content was listed with full sources

it doesnt explain why YOU think its unsourced material

original sources cited on 11th january so whats the problem

www.highbeamresearch.com or findarticles.com both have detailed information on all the points added