Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrey Stingers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jskivington (talk | contribs) |
Jskivington (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Keep''' for reasons mentioned by [[User:MLA|MLA]]. The article's stub status should not be held against it. -[[User:Masonpatriot|Masonpatriot]] 15:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' for reasons mentioned by [[User:MLA|MLA]]. The article's stub status should not be held against it. -[[User:Masonpatriot|Masonpatriot]] 15:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''This site is the only reliable record of team history, as the league page is constantly down.[[User:Jskivington|Jskivington]] 16:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''This site is the only reliable record of team history, as the league page is constantly down.[[User:Jskivington|Jskivington]] 16:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*''' |
:*'''Comment'''I have just added more information, and referenced everything I could.[[User:Jskivington|Jskivington]] 17:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
:*'''Comment''' You may only vote once, your additions did not make the page significantly better and did not address the main concern that the team are not noteworthy and do not deserve a page. Also, because you want some information to be preserved somewhere does not mean it should be on wikipedia.[[User:Simondrake|Simondrake]] 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
:*'''Comment''' You may only vote once, your additions did not make the page significantly better and did not address the main concern that the team are not noteworthy and do not deserve a page. Also, because you want some information to be preserved somewhere does not mean it should be on wikipedia.[[User:Simondrake|Simondrake]] 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per all above. What are the criterion for British American Football teams anyhow? I know with Football its the first ten layers of the pyramid or something like that, is there similar rules for American Football? [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 20:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per all above. What are the criterion for British American Football teams anyhow? I know with Football its the first ten layers of the pyramid or something like that, is there similar rules for American Football? [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 20:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:05, 2 March 2007
- Surrey Stingers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not noteable, Not Referenced, Likely to be Unreferencable, Non-Neutral Point Of View, Not noteable, Limited (And poorly written) Content(And unlikely to be improved given the rarety of edits), insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject, self promotion, and also Not Noteable. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#The_primary_notability_criterion Was proposed for deletion previously and the tab removed with the reasoning that there are several other football pages out there. See also the 'Bellsprout' debate and remember just because a similar page exists doesn't mean that page SHOULD exist.Simondrake 09:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Emphatically Delete Six simple words THIS SPORTS TEAM IS NOTE NOTEABLE.Simondrake 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep member of the British Collegiate American Football League, a notable league that conveys notability on its members. MLA 11:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The group may be noteable but this team is not... see the Surrey Stingers Discussion page for an explanation of why this is an important distinction.Simondrake 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I have asked an Advocate to help with this situation, hopefully that will clarify why the Stingers are or are not Noteworthy, for reasons other than Simondrake says so.Jskivington 21:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons mentioned by MLA. The article's stub status should not be held against it. -Masonpatriot 15:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- KeepThis site is the only reliable record of team history, as the league page is constantly down.Jskivington 16:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- CommentI have just added more information, and referenced everything I could.Jskivington 17:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment You may only vote once, your additions did not make the page significantly better and did not address the main concern that the team are not noteworthy and do not deserve a page. Also, because you want some information to be preserved somewhere does not mean it should be on wikipedia.Simondrake 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per all above. What are the criterion for British American Football teams anyhow? I know with Football its the first ten layers of the pyramid or something like that, is there similar rules for American Football? Jcuk 20:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)