Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural History of South Asia mailing list: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Delete''' appears non notable. I doubt we could find any independent source, but if we do than I would change my vote. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] 00:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' appears non notable. I doubt we could find any independent source, but if we do than I would change my vote. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] 00:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
* '''DO NOT DELETE''', The article should not be deleted for reasons I have written about in the article because of the sheer importance of this list to the NGOs, but the article has to be improved, editors are welcome to improve this page and do more research and add independent sources etc.. This is a very famous list doing very important and urgently needed work. Thanks [[User:Atulsnischal|Atulsnischal]] 04:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
* '''DO NOT DELETE''', The article should not be deleted for reasons I have written about in the article because of the sheer importance of this list to the NGOs, but the article has to be improved, editors are welcome to improve this page and do more research and add independent sources etc.. This is a very famous list doing very important and urgently needed work. Thanks [[User:Atulsnischal|Atulsnischal]] 04:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

* '''Delete''': Non-notable mailing list. Also, unencyclopedic. -[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] 11:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


==='''"Nathistory-India List": some References'''===
==='''"Nathistory-India List": some References'''===

Revision as of 11:06, 3 March 2007

Natural History of South Asia - General Discussion and Research Emailing List

Natural History of South Asia - General Discussion and Research Emailing List (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non notable MLs End33 21:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete appears non notable. I doubt we could find any independent source, but if we do than I would change my vote. --Daniel J. Leivick 00:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE, The article should not be deleted for reasons I have written about in the article because of the sheer importance of this list to the NGOs, but the article has to be improved, editors are welcome to improve this page and do more research and add independent sources etc.. This is a very famous list doing very important and urgently needed work. Thanks Atulsnischal 04:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Non-notable mailing list. Also, unencyclopedic. -Ragib 11:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Nathistory-India List": some References

Atulsnischal 05:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment WP:WEB states the following do not count: "Trivial coverage, such as (1) newspaper articles that simply report the internet address, (2) newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available, (3) a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of internet addresses and site or (4) content descriptions in internet directories or online stores." Which seems to be what most of the above are (I didn't look through them all - but one of those listed is just a link that someone emailed the list). *Mishatx*-In\Out 05:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]