Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha S. Scott: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:50, 4 March 2007

Everything, including the living person's full name, date and place of birth, place raised, town information, descent, family's names and information, jobs held and at what age, how and when came about, and personal beliefs, are not proven true and therefore, not liable to complete the article. I feel we owe it to this living person to have proven information before creating the article and including information not proven true. (WGAmerica 18:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I started this article as the reporter who did speak with the screenwriter for my university-based e-zine and magazine. However, I see your reasons for deletion and I don't disagree that much of the information is not proven true. Until more "proven" information is given, delete the article. (Caysonbelle 18:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Revision as of 18:50, 4 March 2007 edit Caysonbelle (talk \| contribs) 65 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:50, 4 March 2007 edit undo Caysonbelle (talk \| contribs) 65 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Everything, including the living person's full name, date and place of birth, place raised, town information, descent, family's names and information, jobs held and at what age, how and when came about, and personal beliefs, are not proven true and therefore, not liable to complete the article. I feel we owe it to this living person to have proven information before creating the article and including information not proven true. ([[User:WGAmerica\|WGAmerica]] 18:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC))		Everything, including the living person's full name, date and place of birth, place raised, town information, descent, family's names and information, jobs held and at what age, how and when came about, and personal beliefs, are not proven true and therefore, not liable to complete the article. I feel we owe it to this living person to have proven information before creating the article and including information not proven true. ([[User:WGAmerica\|WGAmerica]] 18:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC))

	I started this article as the reporter who did speak with the screenwriter for my university-based e-zine and magazine. However, I see your reasons for deletion and I don't disagree that much of the information is not proven true. Until more "proven" information is given, delete the article. ([[User:Caysonbelle\|Caysonbelle]] 18:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC))		I started this article as the reporter who '''did''' speak with the screenwriter for my university-based e-zine and magazine. However, I see your reasons for deletion and I don't disagree that much of the information is not proven true. Until more '''"proven"''' information is given, delete the article. ([[User:Caysonbelle\|Caysonbelle]] 18:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC))