Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanfield Swifts F.C.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m moved bit of text which had been accidentally chopped off the end of Dudesleeper's comment..........
Line 9: Line 9:
::It's actually quite a long article for a junior club. I started the article and haven't had much assistance along the way, not least due to the [http://www.jeanfieldswifts.co.uk/ club's website being pulled by its board]. - [[User:Dudesleeper|Dudesleeper]] · <small>[[User_talk:Dudesleeper|Talk]]</small> 20:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
::It's actually quite a long article for a junior club. I started the article and haven't had much assistance along the way, not least due to the [http://www.jeanfieldswifts.co.uk/ club's website being pulled by its board]. - [[User:Dudesleeper|Dudesleeper]] · <small>[[User_talk:Dudesleeper|Talk]]</small> 20:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
::"Out of order"? If you think so, I apologise, but the point I was trying to make was that if this club were playing in an English League of a roughly equivalent standard, say the North West Counties League, there would be no prospect of deletion (e.g. See [[Holker Old Boys F.C.]] or [[Leek CSOB F.C.]]), and rightly so. - [[User:Richard Rundle|fchd]] 21:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
::"Out of order"? If you think so, I apologise, but the point I was trying to make was that if this club were playing in an English League of a roughly equivalent standard, say the North West Counties League, there would be no prospect of deletion (e.g. See [[Holker Old Boys F.C.]] or [[Leek CSOB F.C.]]), and rightly so. - [[User:Richard Rundle|fchd]] 21:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
::PrincessBrat, get over yourself. In what way was Richard's comment "out of order"? He was merely pointing out that this is a club of similar stature to the hundreds of English non-league clubs that are on Wikipedia at present. He has quite eloquently explained what the term "junior" football means in a Scottish context, and that for me should suffice to keep the article. By the way, that means I say '''keep''' as well. As for your comments about the article being short - that surely isn't a basis for deletion. Otherwise we have to go around deleting every stub article that exists on the website! furthermore the length of any article is purely a subjective matter and no basis for deletion. - [[User:Big Jim Fae Scotland|Big Jim Fae Scotland]] 11:03, 7 March 2007
*'''Keep''' - per [[User:Richard Rundle|fchd]]. Lazy nomination. - [[User:Dudesleeper|Dudesleeper]] · <small>[[User_talk:Dudesleeper|Talk]]</small> 20:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - per [[User:Richard Rundle|fchd]]. Lazy nomination. - [[User:Dudesleeper|Dudesleeper]] · <small>[[User_talk:Dudesleeper|Talk]]</small> 20:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - per fchd. [[User:ArtVandelay13|ArtVandelay13]] 20:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - per fchd. [[User:ArtVandelay13|ArtVandelay13]] 20:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:04, 7 March 2007

Jeanfield Swifts F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Amateur junior football club. Ordinarily those are nonnotable, but this one has been around since 1928 so I'm more comfortable with AFD than speedy here. NawlinWiki 19:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Although this club has been around since 1928, there isnt much content about it. Its merely a list with the squad and club committee members. I wouldnt have thought its notable to anyone outside the local area. Id maybe change my mind if there were some details whats so notable and great about this club, as the article in its present state is at best a glorified list. --PrincessBrat 19:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete totally non notable and fails WP:CORP. Being formed in 1928 is not notable or unusual, most pub teams can trace roots back further than that. Nuttah68 19:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - "Junior" in the Scottish context does not mean Under-18 players or anything like that. The Scottish Junior F.A. to which Jeanfield are affilated adminsters most of what would be "non-league" football in England. Several Junior clubs get much larger crowds than Scottish League Division Three, but there is no mechanism for them to move to come under the jurisdiction of the SFA and join the Scottish League. The Scottish Junior Cup final often draws a 5-figure crowd and is shown live on Scottish TV. If they were situated south of Hadrian's Wall, a club of this stature would be notable. Don't be put off by the word "Junior". In my opinion, all SJFA clubs would count as notable (there's another level, Scottish Amateur Football below that, and I certainly wouldn't vote to keep any club at that level) - fchd 19:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have to respond as an Englishman to the Hadrians Wall comment - which was out of order. If this club is so great and attracts big crowds, why is the article so short and has nothign to offer? Id be prepared to retract my view if more detail is put into the article but I have doubts that it will. --PrincessBrat 20:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually quite a long article for a junior club. I started the article and haven't had much assistance along the way, not least due to the club's website being pulled by its board. - Dudesleeper · Talk 20:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Out of order"? If you think so, I apologise, but the point I was trying to make was that if this club were playing in an English League of a roughly equivalent standard, say the North West Counties League, there would be no prospect of deletion (e.g. See Holker Old Boys F.C. or Leek CSOB F.C.), and rightly so. - fchd 21:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PrincessBrat, get over yourself. In what way was Richard's comment "out of order"? He was merely pointing out that this is a club of similar stature to the hundreds of English non-league clubs that are on Wikipedia at present. He has quite eloquently explained what the term "junior" football means in a Scottish context, and that for me should suffice to keep the article. By the way, that means I say keep as well. As for your comments about the article being short - that surely isn't a basis for deletion. Otherwise we have to go around deleting every stub article that exists on the website! furthermore the length of any article is purely a subjective matter and no basis for deletion. - Big Jim Fae Scotland 11:03, 7 March 2007
There are three regions: West (four tiers), East (three tiers) and North (also three). I'll defer to someone with more knowledge as to their notability, as I'm a relative newcomer to Scottish junior football's finer points. I'll enquire with Big Jim Fae Scotland, who started the SJFA article. - Dudesleeper Talk 23:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's difficult to place the SJFA clubs alongside the SFA ones, as I've said above, there isn't a mechanism for any interchange between the two. I'd certainly place them at least alongside the Highland clubs etc. If they were in England, I'd expect all but the bottom few North Region clubs to pass the notability claims, and as that would exclude so few I'd be inclined to include them as well to complete the "set". - fchd 05:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions.