Rogue (vagrant): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{copyedit}} |
{{copyedit}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The 1572 Vagabond Act defined a rogue as a healthy person who has no land, no master, no legitimate trade or source of income, and included a rogue in the class of idle [[vagrants]] or [[vagabonds]]. If a person was apprehended as a rogue, he would be stripped to the waist, whipped until bleeding, and had a hole "about the compass of an inch” burned through the gristle of the right ear. A rogue who committed a second offence, unless taken in by someone who would give him work for one year, could face execution as a [[Felon]]. A third offence perpetrator will only escape death if someone who would hire him for two years. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
In modern English usage, the term 'rogue' can be used to describe an independent person who may occasionally shirk conventional rules and methods of conduct in favor of personal goals or values. A rogue will usually operate on his own self contrived values system which inevitably collides with those of the organizations or the society in which he is part of. |
|||
⚫ | An example would be a former member of a military organization "going rogue" to pursue paramilitary, soldier of fortune goals, or at worst, becoming a criminal. Another example would be the term 'rogue programmer' be used to indicate someone who doesn't follow established development practices or guidelines in an organization to accomplish his own goals. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Typical roguish behavior includes ignoring rules, standards and conventions or finding clever ways to circumvent the rules via a loophole or exploit. Rogues may not necessarily abide by the rules, conduct and ethics of the organization or society which they exist in, but rogues may have differing methods and values systems which enable them to circumvent beuracratic systems or restrictions. |
|||
[[Category:Legal history]] |
[[Category:Legal history]] |
Revision as of 03:59, 9 March 2007
This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. |
The word rogue, a cultural icon of villainy and criminality, was first recorded in print in Thomas Awdeley’s Fraternity of Vagabonds (1561), and then in Thomas Harman’s Caveat for Common Cursitors.
The 1572 Vagabond Act defined a rogue as a healthy person who has no land, no master, no legitimate trade or source of income, and included a rogue in the class of idle vagrants or vagabonds. If a person was apprehended as a rogue, he would be stripped to the waist, whipped until bleeding, and had a hole "about the compass of an inch” burned through the gristle of the right ear. A rogue who committed a second offence, unless taken in by someone who would give him work for one year, could face execution as a Felon. A third offence perpetrator will only escape death if someone who would hire him for two years.
The 1598 Vagabond Act banished and transplanted “incorrigible and dangerous rogues” to overseas countries, and the 1604 Act commanded that rogues should be branded with the letter “R” on their bodies.
In modern English usage, the term 'rogue' can be used to describe an independent person who may occasionally shirk conventional rules and methods of conduct in favor of personal goals or values. A rogue will usually operate on his own self contrived values system which inevitably collides with those of the organizations or the society in which he is part of.
An example would be a former member of a military organization "going rogue" to pursue paramilitary, soldier of fortune goals, or at worst, becoming a criminal. Another example would be the term 'rogue programmer' be used to indicate someone who doesn't follow established development practices or guidelines in an organization to accomplish his own goals.