Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillyblog: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:09, 9 March 2007

Phillyblog

Notability not met per WP:WEB - no evidence of coverage in third-party, reliable sources. (Which also means failure of WP:ATT). Contested prod. (Prod was contested by deleting the prod notice and asserting notability on talk page, but no evidence or sources provided.)RJASE1 ^Talk 22:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion. Phillyblog has an impact on Philadelphia (and beyond). I will go add in some more references if necessary. --evrik ^(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is used internatioanlly as a resource on Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. --evrik ^(talk) 15:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not convinced that a site used only by residents of the Philadelphia area is notable.--Anthony.bradbury 22:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see any community impact. I do not see any dirth of information that is important to future visitors or residents to the city. I see squabbling, holocaust deniers, and flat out unlikeable people that give the city a bad name. It is not relevant and thus should not be on Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chiefsalsa (talk • contribs) 16:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose deletion. For users of new media, Phillyblog is a primary source of information. Its Alexa.com traffic rankings are comparable to the websites of the city's alternative weekly newspapers (City Paper and Philly Weekly), both of which regularly mention PhillyBlog. I have added links to two published articles about PhillyBlog to the entry. Wash West 191 19:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion. The site provides information about the city to new residents and to visitors from elsewhere around the county and the world. It may be "up-and-coming" but it's still a critical source of information. --Magic 21:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Delete''' I do not see any community impact. I do not see any dirth of information that is important to future visitors or residents to the city. I see squabbling, holocaust deniers, and flat out unlikeable people that give the city a bad name. It is not relevant and thus should not be on Wikipedia. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Chiefsalsa|Chiefsalsa]] ([[User talk:Chiefsalsa|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chiefsalsa|contribs]]) 16:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
 *'''Oppose''' deletion. For users of new media, Phillyblog is a primary source of information.  Its Alexa.com traffic rankings are comparable to the websites of the city's alternative weekly newspapers (City Paper and Philly Weekly), both of which regularly mention PhillyBlog.  I have added links to two published articles about PhillyBlog to the entry. [[User:Wash West 191|Wash West 191]] 19:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Oppose''' deletion. The site provides information about the city to new residents and to visitors from elsewhere around the county and the world. It may be "up-and-coming" but it's still a critical source of information. --[[User:MagicMan22|Magic]] 21:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)