Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Absolute Keep
Line 19: Line 19:


Dr Imtiyaz, Bangladesh
Dr Imtiyaz, Bangladesh

== Absolute Keep ==

'''Absolute Keep'''Only 492 references of google do not mention to George Vithoulkas.
The article is well and strongly cited. PubMed, National Library of Medicine Catalog, Scirus, isinet.com Also, his surname is not common. Someone wrote about Papadopoulos. In Greece, we know that there are a few hundreds with surname Papadopoulos. But it doesn't happen the same with surname Vithoulkas. I concern this argument ridiculus.We have to be serious and careful with health and suffering of people. And George Vithoulkas has been dedicated to this. Aristos Antoniadis

Revision as of 22:45, 10 March 2007

There is NO need to delete Prof. Vithoulkas page as he is an authority on Homeopathy eventhough what appears on Wikipedia may appear like an advertisement. But that can be improved upon. I am doing some changes in the following paragraph

Prof Vithoulkas has received many international awards for his contribution to classical homeopathy, including the Right Livelihood Award in 1996 (check the www.rightlivelihood.org website),Gold Medal of the Hungarian Democracy (2000), the title of Professor Honoris Causa at Kiev Medical Academy (2000), collaborating Professor in the Medical Faculty of the Basque University in Spain (1999), in India the 'Homeopath of the Millenium' title given at the hands of the Minister of Health (2000), etc. On Google Video you can find videos from the ceremonies and the awards received.

Type "Homeopathy and Vithoulkas" on Google search and it returns 38,000 results.

Contribution of such a dedicated person should be recognised instead of deleting.

That's very well, but we need reliable sources, and none have been offered. Adam Cuerden talk 18:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is simply a bald-faced lie. You have been given plenty of perfectly reliable sources. --Lee Hunter 21:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is ridiculous...

... to be asking for the deletion of the page of the most important homeopath alive. It constitutes a hardly well-concealed attack against homeopathy itself. The real motives for this ought to at least be acknowledged. The name and contribution of George Vithoulkas is very well known to everyone and anyone who is a student or practitioner of homeopathy. It is disappointing that, in this age and time, attempts to discredit homeopathy have to stoop to such a low level.

Why this question of deletion?

Prof. George Vithoulkas has been working for healthy, happy & creative human beings since 1960. All his articles reflecting his thoughts & opinions on these important issues. Do we not want to be more happy, creative & healthy? So why this question of deletion arises? Is Wikipedia running short of memory? Who are trying to delete the articles of this selfless man? How can we be sure that they are not serving the vested interests of the exploiters?

Dr Imtiyaz, Bangladesh

Absolute Keep

Absolute KeepOnly 492 references of google do not mention to George Vithoulkas. The article is well and strongly cited. PubMed, National Library of Medicine Catalog, Scirus, isinet.com Also, his surname is not common. Someone wrote about Papadopoulos. In Greece, we know that there are a few hundreds with surname Papadopoulos. But it doesn't happen the same with surname Vithoulkas. I concern this argument ridiculus.We have to be serious and careful with health and suffering of people. And George Vithoulkas has been dedicated to this. Aristos Antoniadis