User talk:JFreeman: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:08, 11 March 2007

Welcome to my talk page.
Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

Mix up

I signed up tonight for one reason. I have never tried to delete anything including the Russian article from your site or any one elses. Jenny Wms.

School/Institution Vandalism

This area is relly not a talk subject, rather an apolgy. I am making an effort to aplogise to all those who posted a warning on the Julian Jr. High Talk Page. On Behalf of the under educated and crude wiki vandalizers at my Jr High, I would like to apologise. Our IP adress has been blocked, and I want it to stay that way. This is an insult to this encyclopedia. Again, I apologise. Thank you.

-Nick B, Student and wiki editor.

--I am your father. 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Very much

Again, thank you so muchTonyCrew 17:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:89.242.83.202

Why did you add two more warnings to theis talk page when they hadn't actually vandalised ast all after my warning? I took the liberty of removing one of your warnings as being OTT in the circumstances.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

contrary to illustrious the paragraph that was no doubt copied and pasted on how I'm a spammer, I'd like to clarify that i'm not. I'll discuss things in the talks section before writing in articles next time.

regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.35.77.77 (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Go back more...

The version I saw was clearly [[1]] when I did my edit. Is it my fault that Wikipedia had a delayed edit (like always?)?

Again, use your brain before accusing someone of vandalism, especially going warning happy.

--131.204.127.101 21:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, take a loot at What Vandalism Is Not

And let me know how my actions were vandalism that warranted two warnings.

"If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as such, then it is he or she who is actually harming the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors."

Overzealeous editors like youself are what turn people off. --131.204.127.101 21:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could You Help Me Please?

This user by the name of Jvandub has been vandalizing the Drew Stanton article. If you have the time could you please keep an eye on it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by - MrKing84 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

On Warnings

Just an FYI, you have warned me twice for editing articles that I've never touched or even read. You need to exercise caution when reporting and/or warning unregistered users by IP address, as I do not have a static IP, nor do the 1500 other individuals with amongst whom this IP address rotates. 12.150.23.178 21:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the user's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 02:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism & 206.173.167.194

User 206.173.167.194 recently vandalized the chicken (food) article, and viewing his/her talk page, I noticed they had many warnings, the most recent of which was from you. As a relatively new wikipedia editor, I don't know how to block them. If you could look at their recent vandalism, and block them if you see fit (as you said would happen if they continued such behavior), I'd appreciate it.--Grendlefuzz 10:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on Grendlefuzz' talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 15:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from 65.95.0.214 / 70.49.129.200

you realise that you can never ban me, ever... it takes me 5 seconds to change my IP address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.49.129.200 (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Richard Jeni

Mr Jeni has passed away, whether or not i have an article to go with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.73.190 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the editor's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 06:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern. Sorry. He is a client of mine and thought i would add it. I will wait until tomorrow when the news breaks. Again, sorry.

Revision as of 06:06, 11 March 2007 edit JFreeman (talk \| contribs) 9,270 edits →‎Richard Jeni: My response ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:08, 11 March 2007 edit undo 69.234.73.190 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 80:		Line 80:

	:I replied on [[User talk:69.234.73.190\|the editor's talk page]]. --[[User:JFreeman\|'''JFreeman''']] [[User talk:JFreeman\|<sup>''(talk)''</sup>]] 06:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)		:I replied on [[User talk:69.234.73.190\|the editor's talk page]]. --[[User:JFreeman\|'''JFreeman''']] [[User talk:JFreeman\|<sup>''(talk)''</sup>]] 06:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

			I understand your concern. Sorry. He is a client of mine and thought i would add it. I will wait until tomorrow when the news breaks. Again, sorry.