Jump to content

User talk:The Nervous Mermaid: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Griot~enwiki (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== [[Ralph Nader]] ==
== [[Ralph Nader]] ==
Thank you for your contributions to this article. There is an on-going discussion about the inclusion of the citation you removed on the [[Talk:Ralph Nader|article talk page]]. Please discuss this change there and seek consensus for the your position on what should or should not be included in the article, rather than [[WP:EW|edit warring]]. Exessive edit warring can produce an edit-lock on the article, and can lead to violations of the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] that can get you blocked from editing wikipedia. Our encyclopedia works best when it works by consensus, please participate in the process. -- [[User:Pastordavid|Pastordavid]] 21:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to this article. There is an on-going discussion about the inclusion of the citation you removed on the [[Talk:Ralph Nader|article talk page]]. Please discuss this change there and seek consensus for the your position on what should or should not be included in the article, rather than [[WP:EW|edit warring]]. Exessive edit warring can produce an edit-lock on the article, and can lead to violations of the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] that can get you blocked from editing wikipedia. Our encyclopedia works best when it works by consensus, please participate in the process. -- [[User:Pastordavid|Pastordavid]] 21:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
:I think you misuderstand Wikipedia's POV policy. The policy states that contributors may not express their own points of view, but may include other's POV in articles as long as they are properly sourced. Including the quote from the Atlantic Monthly is not POV. Griot 14:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:49, 11 March 2007

Thank you for your contributions to this article. There is an on-going discussion about the inclusion of the citation you removed on the article talk page. Please discuss this change there and seek consensus for the your position on what should or should not be included in the article, rather than edit warring. Exessive edit warring can produce an edit-lock on the article, and can lead to violations of the three-revert rule that can get you blocked from editing wikipedia. Our encyclopedia works best when it works by consensus, please participate in the process. -- Pastordavid 21:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]