Jump to content

User talk:RomanGladiator2000: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Wikipedia is a failure. It is a terrible toxic project with toxic administrators. I am leaving this stupid project forever.
Line 3: Line 3:
I am done with Wikipedia. It is a terrible project with toxic "administrators" who make false accusations of "sockpuppetry" etc. A project which punishes editors by framing them and falsely accusing them of sockpuppetry does not deserve to survive at all.
I am done with Wikipedia. It is a terrible project with toxic "administrators" who make false accusations of "sockpuppetry" etc. A project which punishes editors by framing them and falsely accusing them of sockpuppetry does not deserve to survive at all.


I have never socked before however I was framed.
This is a good read. I never socked and was falsely accused.[https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/zieyyf/wikipedia_is_not_so_great_and_is_overrated/]


Be "BOLD" policy is all bullshit. You've got a lot of gatekeepers here.
Be "BOLD" policy is all bullshit. You've got a lot of gatekeepers here.

I will never come back to this stupid project. Unless these toxic administrators leave, Wikipedia will be a failure. Indeed this project is a failure.

Revision as of 02:09, 10 June 2023

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

I am done with Wikipedia. It is a terrible project with toxic "administrators" who make false accusations of "sockpuppetry" etc. A project which punishes editors by framing them and falsely accusing them of sockpuppetry does not deserve to survive at all.

I have never socked before however I was framed.

Be "BOLD" policy is all bullshit. You've got a lot of gatekeepers here.

I will never come back to this stupid project. Unless these toxic administrators leave, Wikipedia will be a failure. Indeed this project is a failure.