Jump to content

Indescribable cardinal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}}
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


==Relationships in the large cardinal hierarchy==
==Relationships in the large cardinal hierarchy==
A cardinal is Σ{{su|p=1|b=n+1}}-indescribable iff it is Π{{su|p=1|b=n}}-indescribable. The property of being Π{{su|p=1|b=n}}-indescribable is Π{{su|p=1|b=n+1}}. For m>1, the property of being Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable is Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}} and the property of being Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable is Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}. Thus, for m>1, every cardinal that is either Π{{su|p=m|b=n+1}}-indescribable or Σ{{su|p=m|b=n+1}}-indescribable is both Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable and Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable and the set of such cardinals below it is stationary. The consistency strength is Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinals is below that of Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable, but for m>1 it is consistent with ZFC that the least Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable exists and is above the least Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal (this is proved from consistency of ZFC with Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal and a Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal above it).
A cardinal is Σ{{su|p=1|b=n+1}}-indescribable if it is Π{{su|p=1|b=n}}-indescribable. The property of being Π{{su|p=1|b=n}}-indescribable is Π{{su|p=1|b=n+1}}. For m>1, the property of being Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable is Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}} and the property of being Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable is Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}. Thus, for m>1, every cardinal that is either Π{{su|p=m|b=n+1}}-indescribable or Σ{{su|p=m|b=n+1}}-indescribable is both Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable and Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable and the set of such cardinals below it is stationary. The consistency strength is Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinals is below that of Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable, but for m>1 it is consistent with ZFC that the least Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable exists and is above the least Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal (this is proved from consistency of ZFC with Π{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal and a Σ{{su|p=m|b=n}}-indescribable cardinal above it).


Measurable cardinals are Π{{su|p=2|b=1}}-indescribable, but the smallest measurable cardinal is not Σ{{su|p=2|b=1}}-indescribable. However, assuming [[Axiom of choice|choice]], there are many totally indescribable cardinals below any measurable cardinal.
Measurable cardinals are Π{{su|p=2|b=1}}-indescribable, but the smallest measurable cardinal is not Σ{{su|p=2|b=1}}-indescribable. However, assuming [[Axiom of choice|choice]], there are many totally indescribable cardinals below any measurable cardinal.

Revision as of 14:42, 6 July 2023

In mathematics, a Q-indescribable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number that is hard to axiomatize in some language Q. There are many different types of indescribable cardinals corresponding to different choices of languages Q. They were introduced by Hanf & Scott (1961).

A cardinal number is called Πn
m
-indescribable
if for every Πm proposition φ, and set A ⊆ Vκ with (Vκ+n, ∈, A) ⊧ φ there exists an α < κ with (Vα+n, ∈, A ∩ Vα) ⊧ φ.[1] Following Lévy, here one looks at formulas with m-1 alternations of quantifiers with the outermost quantifier being universal. Σn
m
-indescribable
cardinals are defined in a similar way. The idea is that κ cannot be distinguished (looking from below) from smaller cardinals by any formula of n+1-th order logic with m-1 alternations of quantifiers even with the advantage of an extra unary predicate symbol (for A). This implies that it is large because it means that there must be many smaller cardinals with similar properties. [citation needed]

The cardinal number κ is called totally indescribable if it is Πn
m
-indescribable for all positive integers m and n.

If is an ordinal, the cardinal number is called -indescribable if for every formula and every subset of such that holds in there is a some such that φ(UVλ) holds in Vλ+α. If α is infinite then α-indescribable ordinals are totally indescribable, and if is finite they are the same as -indescribable ordinals. α-indescribability implies that α<κ, but there is an alternative notion of shrewd cardinals that makes sense when : there is and such that φ(UVλ) holds in Vλ+β.

Historical note

Originally, a cardinal κ was called Q-indescribable if for every Q-formula and relation , if then there exists an such that .[2][3] Using this definition, is -indescribable iff is regular and greater than .[3]p.207 The cardinals satisfying the above version based on the cumulative hierarchy were called strongly Q-indescribable.[4]

Equivalent conditions

A cardinal is inaccessible if and only if it is -indescribable for all positive integers , equivalently iff it is -indescribable, equivalently if it is -indescribable.

-indescribable cardinals are the same as weakly compact cardinals.

If V=L, then for a natural number n>0, an uncountable cardinal is Π1
n
-indescribable iff it's (n+1)-stationary.[5]

Relationships in the large cardinal hierarchy

A cardinal is Σ1
n+1
-indescribable if it is Π1
n
-indescribable. The property of being Π1
n
-indescribable is Π1
n+1
. For m>1, the property of being Πm
n
-indescribable is Σm
n
and the property of being Σm
n
-indescribable is Πm
n
. Thus, for m>1, every cardinal that is either Πm
n+1
-indescribable or Σm
n+1
-indescribable is both Πm
n
-indescribable and Σm
n
-indescribable and the set of such cardinals below it is stationary. The consistency strength is Σm
n
-indescribable cardinals is below that of Πm
n
-indescribable, but for m>1 it is consistent with ZFC that the least Σm
n
-indescribable exists and is above the least Πm
n
-indescribable cardinal (this is proved from consistency of ZFC with Πm
n
-indescribable cardinal and a Σm
n
-indescribable cardinal above it).

Measurable cardinals are Π2
1
-indescribable, but the smallest measurable cardinal is not Σ2
1
-indescribable. However, assuming choice, there are many totally indescribable cardinals below any measurable cardinal.

Totally indescribable cardinals remain totally indescribable in the constructible universe and in other canonical inner models, and similarly for Πm
n
and Σm
n
indescribability.

References

  1. ^ Drake, F. R. (1974). Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics ; V. 76). Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN 0-444-10535-2.
  2. ^ K. Kunen, "Indescribability and the Continuum" (1971). Appearing in Axiomatic Set Theory: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13 part 1, pp.199--203
  3. ^ a b Azriel Lévy, "The Sizes of the Indescribable Cardinals" (1971). Appearing in Axiomatic Set Theory: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13 part 1, pp.205--218
  4. ^ W. Richter, P. Aczel, "Inductive Definitions and Reflecting Properties of Admissible Ordinals" (1974)
  5. ^ Bagaria, Magidor, Mancilla. On the Consistency Strength of Hyperstationarity, p.3. (2019)