Talk:Wyatt family: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Article name |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Article name== |
==Article name== |
||
Using "dynasty" for anything but actual ruling houses always strikes me as a bit hyperbolic. And in any case, shouldn't the article be named something like [[Wyatt (family of architects)]] or [[Wyatt (architect family)]] to be more in agreement with Wikipedia's naming practices? [[User:Pharamond|Pharamond]] 13:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) |
Using "dynasty" for anything but actual ruling houses always strikes me as a bit hyperbolic. And in any case, shouldn't the article be named something like [[Wyatt (family of architects)]] or [[Wyatt (architect family)]] to be more in agreement with Wikipedia's naming practices? [[User:Pharamond|Pharamond]] 13:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
: Open to suggestions - I was following the title of the main source but agree could be less dramatic[[User:Uneirlys|Uneirlys]] 19:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:03, 23 March 2007
Purpose
Having started with Thomas Henry I am now connecting up the various Wyatt family entries. work in progress Uneirlys 08:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Article name
Using "dynasty" for anything but actual ruling houses always strikes me as a bit hyperbolic. And in any case, shouldn't the article be named something like Wyatt (family of architects) or Wyatt (architect family) to be more in agreement with Wikipedia's naming practices? Pharamond 13:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Open to suggestions - I was following the title of the main source but agree could be less dramaticUneirlys 19:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)