Jump to content

User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blah Blah Blah
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
== Blah Blah Blah ==
== Blah Blah Blah ==


Every edit you ever make is related to the paranormal, as is your mate Martinphi's, I edit on a wide range of topics, and always have done, before John Edward article came up I always edited anonymously (because I am not an edit counting award hunter), but got told by an admin that I should sign up for various reasons, mainly because the university I lecture at has a leased line and some vandalism was being done via a shared IP address, previously to the Edward debacle I contributed largely to articles on Moroccan culture, Indian culture, and popular music, but since starting editing Edward I have found wikipedia to be a much less objective and informative place where a minority of POV pushing paranormalists I have also my willingness to contribute to be significantly reduced, you guys should really think about what your actions are doing, this is not a personal attack, unlike what you have done on both my talk page and Martinphis talk page.
Every edit you ever make is related to the paranormal, as is your mate Martinphi's, I edit on a wide range of topics, and always have done, before John Edward article came up I always edited anonymously (because I am not an edit counting award hunter), but got told by an admin that I should sign up for various reasons, mainly because the university I lecture at has a leased line and some vandalism was being done via a shared IP address, previously to the Edward debacle I contributed largely to articles on Moroccan culture, Indian culture, and popular music, but since starting editing Edward I have found wikipedia to be a much less objective and informative place where a minority of POV pushing paranormalists are ruining the integrity of the project, I have also my willingness to contribute to be significantly reduced due to petty point scoring and lack of objectivity, you guys should really think about what your actions are doing, this is not a personal attack, unlike what you have done on both my talk page and Martinphis talk page.


In conclusion to this the only two people who I have ever had any "issues" with on wikipedia are you and Martinphi, you have been blocked for a 3RR violation, and Martin is a Meatpuppeteer...you really think you can take the moral high ground. I guess you are going to come back at me with keep it civil, NPA etc etc etc, but your rule waving is getting really really boring.[[User:Belbo Casaubon|Belbo Casaubon]] 21:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
In conclusion to this the only two people who I have ever had any "issues" with on wikipedia are you and Martinphi, you have been blocked for a 3RR violation, and Martin is a Meatpuppeteer...you really think you can take the moral high ground. I guess you are going to come back at me with keep it civil, NPA etc etc etc, but your rule waving is getting really really boring.[[User:Belbo Casaubon|Belbo Casaubon]] 21:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:47, 29 March 2007

Lots of family issues going on. I'll be in-and-out. Dreadlocke 16:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediumship

I have no idea. I only read one of his books, and I don't recall it. What they -or Milo- are doing is to ignore that the definition has to actually make sense. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 23:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Were they talking about in bios? It does say that about bios. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 23:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You asked if the two topics should be addressed separately. I don't think so. The key thing (and I'll add it to the talk page there) is that psychics and mediums and even psychic abilities are things. Mediumship, however is an idea, a religious belief. I personally think the article can cover both topics appropriately, but that's the distinction. One's a thing, the other's an idea.
--Nealparr (yell at me|for what i've done) 03:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Purported

Yeah, I know. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 21:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blah Blah Blah

Every edit you ever make is related to the paranormal, as is your mate Martinphi's, I edit on a wide range of topics, and always have done, before John Edward article came up I always edited anonymously (because I am not an edit counting award hunter), but got told by an admin that I should sign up for various reasons, mainly because the university I lecture at has a leased line and some vandalism was being done via a shared IP address, previously to the Edward debacle I contributed largely to articles on Moroccan culture, Indian culture, and popular music, but since starting editing Edward I have found wikipedia to be a much less objective and informative place where a minority of POV pushing paranormalists are ruining the integrity of the project, I have also my willingness to contribute to be significantly reduced due to petty point scoring and lack of objectivity, you guys should really think about what your actions are doing, this is not a personal attack, unlike what you have done on both my talk page and Martinphis talk page.

In conclusion to this the only two people who I have ever had any "issues" with on wikipedia are you and Martinphi, you have been blocked for a 3RR violation, and Martin is a Meatpuppeteer...you really think you can take the moral high ground. I guess you are going to come back at me with keep it civil, NPA etc etc etc, but your rule waving is getting really really boring.Belbo Casaubon 21:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]