Template talk:Nokia devices: Difference between revisions
shouldnt there be articles for ALL the nokia phones? |
Kozmic sk8r (talk | contribs) it was me who made this comment..... but i forgot to sign in. |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
it doednt look very good with all those links that lead nowhere..... shouldnt someone add articles for the ones with no article allready? |
it doednt look very good with all those links that lead nowhere..... shouldnt someone add articles for the ones with no article allready? |
||
- [[User:kozmic sk8r|<font face="Creepy" color="green" size="3"><b>kozmic</b></font>]]|[[user talk:kozmic sk8r|<font face="Creepy" color="red" size="3"><b>sk8r</b></font>]] 03:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:203.171.81.147|203.171.81.147]] 03:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:43, 14 April 2007
4xxx
Why there aren't any 4xxx phones?81.196.247.155 08:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nokia hasn't produced any. Wibbble 22:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Template title
Now that the N800 (not a phone) is included as part of Nokia's Nseries[1], the title doesn't seem to work so well. 'Nokia devices'? 'Nokia wireless devices'? 'Nokia phones and other devices'? I can't think of anything better, but it does seem a little wrong currently. Hypnotist uk 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I tried changing it to "Nokia devices", but TigerK 69 (talk · contribs) reverted that change with no comment. Thoughts? Note that perhaps the change needs to happen in the template name as well, though that would prove more disruptive. --Josh Triplett 10:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'd prefer that, personally. I see Silpol (talk · contribs) has deleted the tablets, but these ARE Nseries devices and so I believe they should be there. I'd be happier with "Nokia devices" unless there's a compelling reason to keep it as phones. Hypnotist uk 13:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
E series, N series
We should add phones from E and N series (E50, E51, E61, N70, N80, N90, N91)..
anybody against it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sedimin (talk • contribs) 08:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
- Erm, looking at the history, they were already there before the 13th Feb. Are there some missing? Hypnotist uk 13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
N800
Back and forth it goes. The N800 is part of the Nseries. I believe it should go under Nseries to show Nokia's strategy, rather than with the 770. It seems other people disagree a) whether it should be here at all and b) whether it should be listed as part of the Nseries. Rather than keep reverting to my belief it'd be nice to get some consensus on the talk page... Hypnotist uk 11:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- The N800 is on http://www.nseries.com/index.html while the 770 isn't. It's part of the Nseries range, although it's not a cellular terminal. (It is VoIP-capable, so it's technically a 'phone', if you like.) Wibbble 23:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed so, but people keep moving/deleting the N800 (and the 770). If there's no further discussion, we can move the N800 back to the Nseries line in a few days. Hypnotist uk 23:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Those people (probably) have some more clue about past, current and future of Nokia tablet(s), hence they tend to bring more clarity, in form of making both 770 and N800 not-another-phone things (which is true-in-last-instance, actually, do you like it or not). Pity that clarity is lesser priority vs. one's necessity to categorize über alles silpol 15:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe they do have more clue, maybe they don't. IF the 770 and N800 belong on this list, then they should be under the 'line' they're sold under - that is IMHO: Nseries for N800, and other for 770. It's Nokia categorising the N800 as an Nseries device - take up issues of brand clarity with Espoo. I'd be happy with the template saying "N800 internet tablet" under Nseries though.
- Do I believe the tablets belong on this template? Yes, though I'm uneasy about it being called 'Nokia phones' (as I've already said). I believe it's less clear to the reader if we leave them out. Hypnotist uk 03:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- silpol: I think you should read over WP:CIVIL and keep that in mind when commenting on talk pages in future. Wibbble 12:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
And now someone thinks it should go at the end of the Nseries list rather than in numerical order. I've no opinion about what's right here, but I do think it looked tidier coming after N80. Hypnotist uk 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
shouldnt there be articles for ALL the nokia phones?
it doednt look very good with all those links that lead nowhere..... shouldnt someone add articles for the ones with no article allready? - kozmic|sk8r 03:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)