Talk:Szprotawa-Wiechlice Airfield: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Buckshot06 (talk | contribs) →3 June 2024: resp |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:[[User:Buckshot06]] you have added back 2 dead links and a story from 2013 about someone hoping to reopen the airport, that does not satisfy [[WP:RS]]. Have you even bothered looking at Google Earth? You will see that the airport is non-operational. [[User:Mztourist|Mztourist]] ([[User talk:Mztourist|talk]]) 07:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
:[[User:Buckshot06]] you have added back 2 dead links and a story from 2013 about someone hoping to reopen the airport, that does not satisfy [[WP:RS]]. Have you even bothered looking at Google Earth? You will see that the airport is non-operational. [[User:Mztourist|Mztourist]] ([[User talk:Mztourist|talk]]) 07:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::News stories, whether now accessible or not, are far more [[WP:RS]] than someone looking at Google Earth. If you want to point me to a policy discussion or decision that endorses Google Earth as a source, that I am not aware of, feel free. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 08:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
::News stories, whether now accessible or not, are far more [[WP:RS]] than someone looking at Google Earth. If you want to point me to a policy discussion or decision that endorses Google Earth as a source, that I am not aware of, feel free. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 08:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::If the stories are not accessible they're not [[WP:RS]] and so the content is unreffed and can be deleted. Apply some common sense, look at the airfield it is clearly not open for use. It also has no IATA or ICAO numbers, no runway numbers, no control tower, no radio frequency and it doesn't feature in any airport/airfield directories. Regarding Google Earth, the European Union Aviation Safety Organisation recommends using it for landing site identification here on page 8: [https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/HE3_Off-Airfield-Landing-Site-Operations.pdf]. [[User:Mztourist|Mztourist]] ([[User talk:Mztourist|talk]]) 08:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:54, 12 June 2024
3 June 2024[edit]
User:Buckshot06, you added the information, you have to provide the WP:RS. Mztourist (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Did you even bother checking the links? Because they don't take you to the stories. Mztourist (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- User:Buckshot06 you have added back 2 dead links and a story from 2013 about someone hoping to reopen the airport, that does not satisfy WP:RS. Have you even bothered looking at Google Earth? You will see that the airport is non-operational. Mztourist (talk) 07:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- News stories, whether now accessible or not, are far more WP:RS than someone looking at Google Earth. If you want to point me to a policy discussion or decision that endorses Google Earth as a source, that I am not aware of, feel free. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- If the stories are not accessible they're not WP:RS and so the content is unreffed and can be deleted. Apply some common sense, look at the airfield it is clearly not open for use. It also has no IATA or ICAO numbers, no runway numbers, no control tower, no radio frequency and it doesn't feature in any airport/airfield directories. Regarding Google Earth, the European Union Aviation Safety Organisation recommends using it for landing site identification here on page 8: [1]. Mztourist (talk) 08:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- News stories, whether now accessible or not, are far more WP:RS than someone looking at Google Earth. If you want to point me to a policy discussion or decision that endorses Google Earth as a source, that I am not aware of, feel free. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)