User talk:Jdlh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 15 April 2007

Just wanted to say you were exactly right about your concern on the Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicle article. I reviewed the article and made a number of changes. Joema 01:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Jdlh | Talk 06:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee elections

Note to self: Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote by 22 January 2006, 23:59 UTC. Review candidate info there and in Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-01-02/ArbCom_candidates and in Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-01-09/ArbCom_election. --Jdlh | Talk 22:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category:College and Univeristy Types

I saw your note on Deathawk's talk page about this category. I've moved it to Category:University and college types. In general, to change which articles are listed in a category, one must edit all of the articles themselves (they will all have [[Category:cat name]] in the article source, usually at the very bottom. If you run across another case where this would be a lot of work, you might want to check out {{Category_redirect}}. btm _talk 22:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

It was inadvertant, so I should apologise - I'll take more care next time. Keras.

Constitution of Japan needs update?

Hi, Beland, thanks for your efforts on behalf of Wikipedia. You tagged the section of Constitution of Japan regarding the LDP 2005 proposed reforms as needing an update. Would you mind putting a note in Talk:Constitution of Japan clarifying what update you believe is necessary? Have you heard about some specific developments, or are you just thinking that it's nearly a year later, so it's time for more recent information? Thanks, --Jdlh | Talk 17:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a clarification there. Thanks for reading, Beland 02:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill

Just added a picture to the discussion at the Churchill discussion, that guy who says he's serving is either a) lying or b) a bit thick :).. As for a published source about the Royal Navy officer hows this? http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/issues/2001/Apr/USS_Churchill.htm (although its not the man in the article anymore, its a woman as you can see by the other picture..)

Goose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheMongoose (talk • contribs) 01:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]