Jump to content

Executive federalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: isbn. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine
Downcase executive federalism b/c this is a concept, not a proper noun.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Executive federalism''' is "the processes of intergovernmental negotiation that are dominated by the [[Executive (government)|executives]] of the different governments within the [[federal system]]."<ref>{{cite book |author1=Ronald L. Watts |author2=Queen's University (Kingston, Ont ) Institute of Intergovernmental Relations |title=Executive Federalism: A Comparative Analysis |date=1989 |publisher=IIGR, Queen's University |isbn=978-0-88911-560-6 |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zoyEFNyEOhAC}}</ref> Alternatively, Donald Smiley defined Executive federalism as “the relation between elected and appointed officials of the two orders of government.” <ref>{{cite web|last=Wells|first=Paul|title=Harper and the death (for now) of executive federalism|url=http://www.macleans.ca/2008/11/10/stephen-harper-and-the-death-for-now-of-executive-federalism/|publisher=Macleans|access-date=12 February 2012|date=November 2008}}</ref>
'''Executive federalism''' is "the processes of intergovernmental negotiation that are dominated by the [[Executive (government)|executives]] of the different governments within the [[federal system]]."<ref>{{cite book |author1=Ronald L. Watts |author2=Queen's University (Kingston, Ont ) Institute of Intergovernmental Relations |title=Executive Federalism: A Comparative Analysis |date=1989 |publisher=IIGR, Queen's University |isbn=978-0-88911-560-6 |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zoyEFNyEOhAC}}</ref> Alternatively, Donald Smiley defined executive federalism as “the relation between elected and appointed officials of the two orders of government.” <ref>{{cite web|last=Wells|first=Paul|title=Harper and the death (for now) of executive federalism|url=http://www.macleans.ca/2008/11/10/stephen-harper-and-the-death-for-now-of-executive-federalism/|publisher=Macleans|access-date=12 February 2012|date=November 2008}}</ref>


== Canada ==
== Canada ==


In Canada, the most publicized aspect of Executive federalism is the [[First Ministers Conference]]; however, in the first decade of the 21st century, the [[Council of the Federation]] became the important bi-annual meeting between the Premiers of Canada. Notable efforts at the [[Council of the Federation]] include the attempt by former [[Premier of Ontario]], [[Mike Harris]], to promote the idea that the provinces should take primary responsibility to set the national standards in social policy <ref>{{cite book|title=Contested Federalism: Certainty and Ambiguity in the Canadian Federation|year=2009|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VnINAQAAMAAJ|pages=109|author1=Herman Bakvis |author2=Gerald Baier |author3=Douglas Brown |isbn=978-0-19-542529-1 }}</ref> and [[Premier of Alberta]], [[Ralph Klein]], calling on other premiers to join him in opposing [[Canadian federal government|Ottawa]]'s signing of the [[Kyoto protocol]].<ref>{{cite news|last=McCarthy|first=Shawn|title=Premiers Derail Klein Plan: Nunavut Leader Warns Colleagues of Lasting Damage from Climate Change|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/premiers-derail-klein-plan/article25302096/|newspaper=[[Globe and Mail]]|date=3 August 2002}}</ref>
In Canada, the most publicized aspect of executive federalism is the [[First Ministers Conference]]; however, in the first decade of the 21st century, the [[Council of the Federation]] became the important bi-annual meeting between the Premiers of Canada. Notable efforts at the [[Council of the Federation]] include the attempt by former [[Premier of Ontario]], [[Mike Harris]], to promote the idea that the provinces should take primary responsibility to set the national standards in social policy <ref>{{cite book|title=Contested Federalism: Certainty and Ambiguity in the Canadian Federation|year=2009|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VnINAQAAMAAJ|pages=109|author1=Herman Bakvis |author2=Gerald Baier |author3=Douglas Brown |isbn=978-0-19-542529-1 }}</ref> and [[Premier of Alberta]], [[Ralph Klein]], calling on other premiers to join him in opposing [[Canadian federal government|Ottawa]]'s signing of the [[Kyoto protocol]].<ref>{{cite news|last=McCarthy|first=Shawn|title=Premiers Derail Klein Plan: Nunavut Leader Warns Colleagues of Lasting Damage from Climate Change|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/premiers-derail-klein-plan/article25302096/|newspaper=[[Globe and Mail]]|date=3 August 2002}}</ref>


==Australia==
==Australia==

Revision as of 20:35, 18 June 2024

Executive federalism is "the processes of intergovernmental negotiation that are dominated by the executives of the different governments within the federal system."[1] Alternatively, Donald Smiley defined executive federalism as “the relation between elected and appointed officials of the two orders of government.” [2]

Canada

In Canada, the most publicized aspect of executive federalism is the First Ministers Conference; however, in the first decade of the 21st century, the Council of the Federation became the important bi-annual meeting between the Premiers of Canada. Notable efforts at the Council of the Federation include the attempt by former Premier of Ontario, Mike Harris, to promote the idea that the provinces should take primary responsibility to set the national standards in social policy [3] and Premier of Alberta, Ralph Klein, calling on other premiers to join him in opposing Ottawa's signing of the Kyoto protocol.[4]

Australia

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, the National Cabinet, consisting of the Prime Minister and the premiers and chief ministers of the Australian states and territories, in order to help guide the country through the crisis.[5][6][7] It has been described as akin to Australia's war cabinet during the Second World War.[8] As a special intergovernmental decision-making forum, its power is that which the leaders of all Australian jurisdictions bring to negotiate on behalf of their people, and to implement the decisions reached, a model which public policy expert Jennifer Menzies calls executive federalism. In this model, the citizens of each state or territory are represented by their elected heads, and the smaller states have equal representation[9]

References

  1. ^ Ronald L. Watts; Queen's University (Kingston, Ont ) Institute of Intergovernmental Relations (1989). Executive Federalism: A Comparative Analysis. IIGR, Queen's University. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-88911-560-6.
  2. ^ Wells, Paul (November 2008). "Harper and the death (for now) of executive federalism". Macleans. Retrieved 12 February 2012.
  3. ^ Herman Bakvis; Gerald Baier; Douglas Brown (2009). Contested Federalism: Certainty and Ambiguity in the Canadian Federation. Oxford University Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-19-542529-1.
  4. ^ McCarthy, Shawn (3 August 2002). "Premiers Derail Klein Plan: Nunavut Leader Warns Colleagues of Lasting Damage from Climate Change". Globe and Mail.
  5. ^ Shoebridge, Michael (18 March 2020). "The national cabinet is key to our coronavirus response. Here's how it will need to work". The Canberra Times. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  6. ^ Albanese, Anthony (15 March 2020). "Press Conference Transcript". pm.gov.au. Prime Minister's Office.
  7. ^ Burton, Tom (18 March 2020). "National cabinet creates a new federal model". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  8. ^ Middleton, Karen (21–27 March 2020). "Inside Morrison's Covid-19 war cabinet". The Saturday Paper (293). Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  9. ^ Menzies, Jennifer (31 March 2020). "Explainer: what is the national cabinet and is it democratic?". The Conversation. Retrieved 31 March 2020. CC BY-ND 4.0