Jump to content

User talk:Bubba hotep: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs)
m 142.150.49.51 didn't sign: "25 or 6 to 4"
Line 29: Line 29:
== 25 or 6 to 4 ==
== 25 or 6 to 4 ==


This being a very cryptic title for a song, the speculation regarding its meaning has always been associated with it. That is why the speculation is ADMITTED in the text of the meaning. The speculation has always been part of the nature and personality of the song. this is why it is included in the Wik page. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/142.150.49.51|142.150.49.51]] ([[User talk:142.150.49.51|talk]]) 21:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
This being a very cryptic title for a song, the speculation regarding its meaning has always been associated with it. That is why the speculation is ADMITTED in the text of the meaning. The speculation has always been part of the nature and personality of the song. This is why it is included in the Wik page. Those who have followed Chicago over the years understand this, and that is why we are managing this page. Please trust us to do our job. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/142.150.49.51|142.150.49.51]] ([[User talk:142.150.49.51|talk]]) 21:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

Revision as of 21:50, 16 April 2007

Please use the "+" tab at the top to start a new discussion topic, or if that's too far to reach, just click here instead :) Please sign your posts with four tildes, thus ~~~~. Talk page deletion/revision log is here. Cheers.

Please also note that, although I will try to respond to your queries as soon as possible, if it looks like I'm not around, you may get a quicker response elsewhere (such as WP:AIV or WP:AN/I). Also, although I have e-mail enabled, I am only able to retrieve it at certain times of the day: so if you send me one and don't get an immediate response, I'm not ignoring you! Honest. :)

For tips on how to tackle the effects of being undead, you might be after this Bubba hotep instead.
Last cleared: 10:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


Splendid fairywren
The splendid fairywren (Malurus splendens) is a passerine bird in the Australasian wren family, Maluridae. It is found across much of the Australian continent from central-western New South Wales and southwestern Queensland over to coastal Western Australia. It inhabits predominantly arid and semi-arid regions. Exhibiting a high degree of sexual dimorphism, the male in breeding plumage is a small, long-tailed bird of bright blue and black colouration. Non-breeding males, females and juveniles are grey-brown in colour; this gave the early impression that males were polygamous as all dull-coloured birds were taken for females. The species comprises several similar all-blue and black subspecies that were originally considered to be separate species. Like other fairywrens, the splendid fairywren is notable for several peculiar behavioural characteristics; birds are socially monogamous and sexually promiscuous, meaning that although they form pairs between one male and one female, each partner will mate with other individuals and even assist in raising the young from such pairings. Male wrens pluck pink or purple petals and display them to females as part of a courtship display. This male splendid fairywren was photographed in Cargelligo State Forest in New South Wales, Australia.Photograph credit: John Harrison

Thanks

Thank you, helpful admin! --Dweller 11:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A fuller list of articles the vandal is interested in can be seen through the contribs of one of the longer lasting socks: Special:Contributions/Rufus_May_Day Susannah Hoffs? I had a HUGE crush on her 20 odd years ago, lol. --Dweller 11:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, yeah. "Walk Like an Egyptian" was a favourite video, if not entirely convinced by the pop-rocky sound. Thanks for the pointer, I'm not sure about one of the articles they created on a "famous" rancher, might need further investigation.... Cheers! :) Bubba hotep 12:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
New one. Special:Contributions/Meiji_Canis --Dweller 14:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I missed blocking that one by a matter of minutes. My activities are a bit erratic today, sorry. :) I see they have turned their attention to the Grey Wolf now. A very strange obsession they have going there. Bubba hotep 14:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're a star. --Dweller 15:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Shucks. Blushes Just doin' my job... my, there are a lot of other wolves out there, though. Bubba hotep 15:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I see you've caught another fishwolf in your net. --Dweller 15:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, one that wasn't blocked earlier, I think. Or was it a new one? Bubba hotep 15:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
New, I think. How long does it take before someone gets tired of not achieving anything. --Dweller 15:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We'll soon find out... :) Bubba hotep 15:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's that guy... Grand Noble as usual!

You wrote: after your notability continues to grow, someone else will inevitably come along and write an article about you. Well therein lies the query. I know that just because somebody else writes a Wiki article about my music group, that does not mean the page will STAY up. So really, what can I do career-wise... that when the WikiMods read my new page, in a few months or whatever, that somebody ELSE wrote about me.. What needs to be on that page so they'll see it as "notable" and "keep-worthy?" If I've (1) done tons of concerts along-side large underground acts and (2) put out multiple albums... what if I (3) get reviewed/interviewed in a Hip Hop magazine or website? Will that alone make my page important? I know I probably sound like a broken record homie, and I'm sorry. But here's my reasoning: I want to know what's the smallest action I could do that would solidify my WikiPage... SO THAT I will now go out and fulfill it. You see what I mean? I feel like I can't really fix my Wikipedia situation because I don't have a goal to work towards. You have really helped a lot man. Hope you can provide some more answers for me. Chris aka Grandnoble 21:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

25 or 6 to 4

This being a very cryptic title for a song, the speculation regarding its meaning has always been associated with it. That is why the speculation is ADMITTED in the text of the meaning. The speculation has always been part of the nature and personality of the song. This is why it is included in the Wik page. Those who have followed Chicago over the years understand this, and that is why we are managing this page. Please trust us to do our job. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.150.49.51 (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]