Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily J. Hilscher: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:20, 18 April 2007

Emily J. Hilscher

Not notable beyond the event of her death. We've gone through this on numerous others. Unless she had something which made her notable before her death she is just a section of the main article as the initial victim. Also, at this point, much is speculation. See the AfD for Ryan C. Clark for another example. StuffOfInterest 12:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Whether she wasn't notable before the shooting doesn't seem that important: she's still notable. Although it isn't an acceptable reason for a keep vote, I would like to point out that we have articles on Rachel Scott (who was also the first victim) and Cassie Bernall from Columbine. And for the record, Cho Seung-hui wasn't notable before his death either. In any event, this article has sources that assert the notability of the subject, exactly the type of article we should encourage on Wikipedia. --Ybbor^TalkSurvey! 12:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rob 13:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Absolutely not notable for reasons other then the person's death. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 13:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Ryan C. Clark's AFD. These people are not notable enough to have their own articles. Put all of this information in with the main article Virginia Tech Massacre. --Cyrus Andiron 13:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As of now, the subject isn't notable beyond the Virginia Tech massacre. Ybbor mentioned in his keep vote above that Cassie Bernall and Rachel Scott each have their own articles, but they have achieved a level of notability beyond (albeit connected to) the circumstances of their deaths through a book and an outreach program, respectively. I will fully support a new article for Hilscher once she receives some kind of notability other than having died in this incident, but until then, my vote is to delete. (My original intent was to vote to merge the article with Virginia Tech massacre or Cho Seung-hui, but the information seems to already be in those articles). Jeff Silvers 13:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Per User:Cyrus Andiron. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mschel (talk • contribs).
Merge If information comes out in upcoming weeks indicating her to be more notable (like if she was the chief motive), then we can always recreate it.--MrFish^{Go Fish} 13:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Delete.''' As of now, the subject isn't notable beyond the [[Virginia Tech massacre]].  Ybbor mentioned in his keep vote above that [[Cassie Bernall]] and [[Rachel Scott]] each have their own articles, but they have achieved a level of notability beyond (albeit connected to) the circumstances of their deaths through a book and an outreach program, respectively.  I will fully support a new article for Hilscher once she receives some kind of notability other than having died in this incident, but until then, my vote is to delete. (My original intent was to vote to merge the article with [[Virginia Tech massacre]] or [[Cho Seung-hui]], but the information seems to already be in those articles). [[User:Jeff Silvers|Jeff Silvers]] 13:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Merge'''. Per [[User:Cyrus Andiron]]. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Mschel|Mschel]] ([[User talk:Mschel|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mschel|contribs]]){{#if:{{{2|}}}|&#32;{{{2}}}|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
+*'''Merge'''  If information comes out in upcoming weeks indicating her to be more notable (like if she was the chief motive), then we can always recreate it.--[[User:MrFish|MrFish]]<sup>[[User talk:MrFish|Go Fish]]</sup> 13:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)