User talk:AgentCDE: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:09, 22 April 2007

Welcome!

Hello, AgentCDE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rama's arrow 17:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking Page

I reverted the article Landmark Education Jargon not blanking it - please look at the whole thread! That was already discussed extensively and then it was "repopulated after it was decided by consensus as non-notable ad redirected to the original article. After that article deleted that content as non-notable the minority view points tried to reverse the consensus decision to redirect this article. I have now set it up for deletion. If you could delete it that would be great! Alex Jackl 19:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response - thank you - I thought I put the delete template on the main page. Thanks for pointing that out. We are having a lot of trouble with people pushing minority POV on the Landmark pages and now that their is a concensus and management happening by multiple editors on the Landmark page they are spreading out to "fringe pages" and adding non-notable POV content there. Thanks for your diligence.

Alex Jackl 19:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page was a redirect before Smee started vandalizing it. I reverted his vandalism and then I put an AFD on it. Please look at the page history. Jossi (an admin) came in and worked with us and at the we redirected the page. Smee is now going against that to avoid his pOV-pushing being exposed on the Landmark page. BTW: Smee was the cause of the Landmark page being locked because of his POV pushing. Alex Jackl 20:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of User:AJackl

You called it like you saw it, appropriately. What you saw was vandalism, pure and simple. The redirect was agreed to after the consensus was to merge the material into the main article. Once that material was removed from the main article, I removed the redirect, to restart a dialogue. Obviously the other user in question does not wish for a dialogue, but rather is content to vandalize. Smee 20:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Absence of link to User Talk

I believe there is a template called User Talk:<your username goes here> that adds a small link that says talk next to your name. it will help users find their way to your Talk Page. 71.96.77.70 17:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That, I believe, is actually a custom signature, set in the account options. Think I might do that now...--AgentCDE 17:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Testing... There we go.--AgentCDE / Talk / 17:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Doris Day Affair

Admit it: This is either a fucking riot or a fucking abortion! Take your pick.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.61.97 (talk • contribs)

It's rather bland, actually.--AgentCDE / Talk / 14:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.