Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clacket Lane: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


*My vote is still provisionally for '''deletion''', as the concerns I shared at length with the article's creators on its [[Talk:Clacket Lane|talk page]] have yet to be addressed in any concrete way. The article still reads more like one of the local band promo-packet cover letters I used to write in college than a Wikipedia article. Specifically, the article is ''still'' a glorified résumé of no discernable value to Wikipedia. [[User:Dynaflow|<font color="#285991">--'''''Dynaflow'''''</font>]] 23:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
*My vote is still provisionally for '''deletion''', as the concerns I shared at length with the article's creators on its [[Talk:Clacket Lane|talk page]] have yet to be addressed in any concrete way. The article still reads more like one of the local band promo-packet cover letters I used to write in college than a Wikipedia article. Specifically, the article is ''still'' a glorified résumé of no discernable value to Wikipedia. [[User:Dynaflow|<font color="#285991">--'''''Dynaflow'''''</font>]] 23:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Added some more information about the band. Still gathering info!
[[User:IndieRobLB|IndieRobLB]] 08:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:00, 25 April 2007

Clacket Lane

Clacket Lane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Page about a music band. A speedy-delete developed into a long inconclusive discussion about its notability in Talk:Clacket Lane. Anthony Appleyard 18:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • My vote is still provisionally for deletion, as the concerns I shared at length with the article's creators on its talk page have yet to be addressed in any concrete way. The article still reads more like one of the local band promo-packet cover letters I used to write in college than a Wikipedia article. Specifically, the article is still a glorified résumé of no discernable value to Wikipedia. --Dynaflow 23:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added some more information about the band. Still gathering info! IndieRobLB 08:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]