Jump to content

Talk:Jumpstyle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
IJs (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
IJs (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


==Quality==
==Quality==
The quality of this article is appalling. Perhaps it could do with a translation of the somewhat bigger articles available in some of the other languages? Besides, I wonder if this article could be merged with a broader article. --[[User:IJs|IJs]] 13:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The quality of this article is appalling. Perhaps it could do with a translation of the somewhat bigger articles available in some of the other languages? Besides, I wonder if this article could be merged with a broader article.. obviously this is about a dance, not a music genre. --[[User:IJs|IJs]] 13:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:17, 27 April 2007

"The dance is also called skank but is different from the Skank associated with goth/rock/metal genres."

Skank is, as the relevant wiki-entry suggests, associated not with goth, rock or most metal genres; but with ska and some hardcore (punk) and metalcore genres. I suggest an edit.--LarsMessy 14:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The dance has nothing to do with MC Hammer. Jumping or Skiing is based on 'hakken' indeed.


I'm from Belgium + active in the jump scene and Jumpstyle has absolutely nothing to do with MC Hammer. I'am going to remove this from the article because it is false information. Hypnotical 09:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Jumpen and Jumpstyle dance are essentially the same thing, except one is the dutch name for the other.24.205.191.138 02:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quality

The quality of this article is appalling. Perhaps it could do with a translation of the somewhat bigger articles available in some of the other languages? Besides, I wonder if this article could be merged with a broader article.. obviously this is about a dance, not a music genre. --IJs 13:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]