Jump to content

User talk:Too late gn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


What a bunch of white washing totalitarians!
What a bunch of white washing totalitarians!

Where is the assumption of Wikipedian Good Faith?

IrishGuy invites me to a discussion, and when I respond he types it as a personal attack? How convenient! Did he even understand the issues? Or was he to busy by response to really use a fair and balanced approach?

Revision as of 03:48, 30 April 2007

Please do not blank comments on talk pages. IrishGuy talk 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 20:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Since it looks like you might finally be willing to discuss your edits, there is an ANI section opened about this. IrishGuy talk 20:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for personal attacks. Calm down and come back tomorrow. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theresa,

My attacks were not personal, that is merely an opinion of another. My comments consisted of unanswered questions which no one in editorial control at Wikipedia is willing to answer. There is a double standard for those in editing power and contributors. I think that to send me a warning is base. I merely pointed out that I would not be threatened. Rather than read the root cause of my issue with edits performed on my contributions, Wikipedia has chosen to threaten (warn is synonymous with threaten in both the dictionary and Thesaurus). That is certainly not an enlightened method for achieving respect.

I deleted comments on my talk page because it is my talk page. Yet IrishGuy claims he cam both delete comments and he engages in reverting entries. No standards for IrisGuy? Cka3n has engaged in opinion editing and multiple reverting to editions that he prefers. No standards for Cka3n?

What a bunch of white washing totalitarians!

Where is the assumption of Wikipedian Good Faith?

IrishGuy invites me to a discussion, and when I respond he types it as a personal attack? How convenient! Did he even understand the issues? Or was he to busy by response to really use a fair and balanced approach?