Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N.F. Houck: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:54, 8 May 2007

N.F. Houck

Absolutely not notable... only published book is through LuLu.com, which means it's self-published. Links to the "author" and book has also been relentlessly spammed to a large number of articles, so existence is also self-promotional vanity cruft. See also Herald (novel) DreamGuy 19:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both N.F. Houck and Herald (novel). No independent sources cited by either article. WorldCat finds only six libraries in the United States with the book, which don't include the Library of Congress. Per WP:BK, a book not in the national library of its country of origin "most likely is not" notable. Google News Archive produces no relevant hits for houck herald hermes. The only hit for the equivalent search on LexisNexis is an 84-word piece from M2 that seems to be reporting a press release from Lulu. EALacey 19:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Herald (novel) because it's spam and N.F. Houck for non-notability. Earlier today I removed a reference from the book's article to the novel being a "finalist" in a "book of the year contest" in a "literary" magazine which was PAID to review this novel and if, as the article N.F. Houck claims, this author is "best known" for a self-published novel which has to pay for reviews then N.F. Houk is non-notable. Random Passer-by (talk) 20:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Absolutely not notable... only published book is through LuLu.com, which means it's self-published. Links to the "author" and book has also been relentlessly spammed to a large number of articles, so existence is also self-promotional vanity cruft. See also [[Herald (novel)]] [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 19:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' both [[N.F. Houck]] and [[Herald (novel)]]. No independent sources cited by either article. WorldCat [http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/70848590&tab=holdings?loc=us finds only six] libraries in the United States with the book, which don't include the Library of Congress. Per [[Wikipedia:Notability (books)|WP:BK]], a book not in the national library of its country of origin "most likely is not" notable. Google News Archive produces no relevant hits for [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=houck+herald+hermes houck herald hermes]. The only hit for the equivalent search on [[LexisNexis]] is an 84-word piece from [http://www.m2.com/ M2] that seems to be reporting a press release from Lulu. [[User:EALacey|EALacey]] 19:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' Herald (novel) because it's spam and N.F. Houk for non-notability. Earlier today I removed a reference from the book's article to the novel being a "finalist" in a "book of the year contest" in a "literary" magazine which was PAID to review this novel and if, as the article N.F. Houk claims, this author is "best known" for a self-published novel which has to pay for reviews then N.F. Houk is non-notable. [[User:Random Passer-by|Random Passer-by]] <small>([[User talk:Random Passer-by|talk]])</small> 20:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Herald (novel) because it's spam and N.F. Houck for non-notability. Earlier today I removed a reference from the book's article to the novel being a "finalist" in a "book of the year contest" in a "literary" magazine which was PAID to review this novel and if, as the article N.F. Houck claims, this author is "best known" for a self-published novel which has to pay for reviews then N.F. Houk is non-notable. [[User:Random Passer-by|Random Passer-by]] <small>([[User talk:Random Passer-by|talk]])</small> 20:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)