Talk:Frank Rossitano: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Since you're so perfect, maybe you could explain to idiotic old me which part of [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|this]] defines your "proposed" deletion as an "indiscriminate collection of trivial information". [[User:67.171.170.241|67.171.170.241]] 21:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC) |
::Since you're so perfect, maybe you could explain to idiotic old me which part of [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|this]] defines your "proposed" deletion as an "indiscriminate collection of trivial information". [[User:67.171.170.241|67.171.170.241]] 21:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
-They're not inconsequential to the character, they're actually more like "the defining quality of the character" As for the definition of Wikipedia, I'd say it's more an indiscriminate collector of trivial information than it is anything else. Might as well delete 50+% of all articles. By the way, I came to this discussion page by way of a google search for "30 rock hats" and a corresponding blog link (http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/04/16/franks-30-rock-hats/) |
-They're not inconsequential to the character, they're actually more like "the defining quality of the character" As for the definition of Wikipedia, I'd say it's more an indiscriminate collector of trivial information than it is anything else. Might as well delete 50+% of all articles. By the way, I came to this discussion page by way of a google search for "30 rock hats" and a corresponding blog link (http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/04/16/franks-30-rock-hats/) [[User:24.68.231.60|24.68.231.60]] 01:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:53, 13 May 2007
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collector of trivial information. A huge, hideously colored subsection on trucker hats (that are inconsequential to the character) is completely unnecessary and will be removed. We are an encyclopedia. I've linked the word for people who seem to forget what that is. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad that you're humble enough to be willing to engage in an intelligent discussion or perhaps even (gasp!) consider dissenting arguments to be slightly more than deletion fodder. Perhaps you might even be willing to consider the possibility that your opinions aren't the be-all, end-all. Your justification leaves much room for POV, but I'm sure that's okay since you can always decide personally what is an "indiscriminate collection of trivial information" or is "hideously colored". After all, you're perfect! 67.171.170.241 11:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Since you're so perfect, maybe you could explain to idiotic old me which part of this defines your "proposed" deletion as an "indiscriminate collection of trivial information". 67.171.170.241 21:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
-They're not inconsequential to the character, they're actually more like "the defining quality of the character" As for the definition of Wikipedia, I'd say it's more an indiscriminate collector of trivial information than it is anything else. Might as well delete 50+% of all articles. By the way, I came to this discussion page by way of a google search for "30 rock hats" and a corresponding blog link (http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/04/16/franks-30-rock-hats/) 24.68.231.60 01:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)