Talk:OScar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m 62.87.96.65 didn't sign: "→Picture: " |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Nowikied your template as the article has since gotten a picture. -- [[User:Intgr|intgr]] 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
:Nowikied your template as the article has since gotten a picture. -- [[User:Intgr|intgr]] 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:: I really think the picture is not very good to include in the article. No all the open vehicles explode. I really think it´s more easy a closed and propietary ICEV ([[Internal combustion engine |
:: I really think the picture is not very good to include in the article. No all the open vehicles explode. I really think it´s more easy a closed and propietary [[ICEV]] ([[Internal combustion engine]] vehicle) can explode than a open electric vehicle. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/62.87.96.65|62.87.96.65]] ([[User talk:62.87.96.65|talk]]) 15:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
||
==Versatile Vehicle Architecture== |
==Versatile Vehicle Architecture== |
||
Revision as of 15:03, 13 May 2007
The right link to OScar in the German entry
Can someone please correct the link to OScar image in the German entry ? I have copied the link but it doesn't seems to work. I didn't find the image in commons ? I can't understand why people are breaking Wikipedia rules of putting all the images in commons so syntax access will always be uniform so won't not have to learn everytime a new syntax --Khalid hassani 13:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Picture
{{Picture}}--Mac 07:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nowikied your template as the article has since gotten a picture. -- intgr 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I really think the picture is not very good to include in the article. No all the open vehicles explode. I really think it´s more easy a closed and propietary ICEV (Internal combustion engine vehicle) can explode than a open electric vehicle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.87.96.65 (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Versatile Vehicle Architecture
- "A long term goal is also to introduce standardization in parts manufacturing (very much in the open source way) to use economies of scale. This is a radical change"
Is this anything like Lotus's Versatile Vehicle Architecture? Would mentioning that be relevant to this article? -- intgr 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)