Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Article RfC example: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:48, 16 May 2007

I came here looking for a RFC example; what the hell is this? How is this a proper example, as it is claimed to be in the header? Why is the last paragraph only in Latin on the English wiki?

Seriously, someone unfamiliar with the RFC process would be far more confused if they clicked on this article than they were before. dharmabum 10:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is one example of a suitable format. The content does not matter, it is an example of one way to effectively organize an RfC and most people have found it fairly clear. —Centrx→talk • 14:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have removed my comment here; I was mistaken as to this example's purpose when I made it. dharmabum 22:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:49, 16 May 2007 edit Centrx (talk \| contribs) 37,287 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:48, 16 May 2007 edit undo Dharmabum420 (talk \| contribs) 3,642 edits No edit summary
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:It is one example of a suitable format. The content does not matter, it is an example of one way to effectively organize an RfC and most people have found it fairly clear. —[[User:Centrx\|Centrx]]→[[User talk:Centrx\|''talk'']] • 14:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)		:It is one example of a suitable format. The content does not matter, it is an example of one way to effectively organize an RfC and most people have found it fairly clear. —[[User:Centrx\|Centrx]]→[[User talk:Centrx\|''talk'']] • 14:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
			::Sorry, should have removed my comment here; I was mistaken as to this example's purpose when I made it. [[User:Dharmabum420\|dharmabum]] 22:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)