Talk:Space art: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:08, 3 June 2007

This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.

 Alright, where does this happen in the article? DD4SKYART 00:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 I have gone through the external links and primarily removed those promoting events and as yet non existent art projects. Zero gravity performance related sites have also been deleted DD4SKYART 01:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Don Davis
I have trimmed the article a little, with an intention of maintaining focus on outer space rather than every kind of 'space' imaginable.  DD4SKYART 02:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the early part of this article is mainly about 'Art in Space', rather than Space Art as understood by the premier (and only) organisation devoted to this subject, the International Association of Astronomical Artists (IAAA), whose own entries may be seen under 'Astronomical Art' and 'IAAA'. If the article under discussion with the title 'Space Art' contains original material, this was probably written by a member of the SpaceartS network, and thus IS original -- by the same writer! I do not see any material that is inappropriate or 'unverified', and I write as a former President of the IAAA and probably the oldest-established living practitioner of space art (first published in 1952). ~~DAVIDAHARDY~~

Would the person who made these claims re. 'original research' and 'unverified claims' please specify what and where these are -- and what evidence they would accept as verification? The artists writing on this page seem to be the best qualified to comment. ~~DAVIDAHARDY~~

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
  I have trimmed the article a little, with an intention of maintaining focus on outer space rather than every kind of 'space' imaginable.  [[User:DD4SKYART|DD4SKYART]] 02:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
-Much of the early part of this article is mainly about 'Art in Space', rather than Space Art as understood by the leading (and only) organisation devoted to this subject, the International Association of Astronomical Artists (IAAA), whose own entries may be seen under 'Astronomical Art' and 'IAAA'. If the article under discussion with the title 'Space Art' contains original material, this was probably written by a member of the SpaceartS network, and thus IS original -- by its writer! I do not see any material that is inappropriate or 'unverified', and I write as a former President of the IAAA and probably the oldest-established practitioner of space art (first published in 1952). ~~DAVIDAHARDY~~
+Much of the early part of this article is mainly about 'Art in Space', rather than Space Art as understood by the premier (and only) organisation devoted to this subject, the International Association of Astronomical Artists (IAAA), whose own entries may be seen under 'Astronomical Art' and 'IAAA'. If the article under discussion with the title 'Space Art' contains original material, this was probably written by a member of the SpaceartS network, and thus IS original -- by the same writer! I do not see any material that is inappropriate or 'unverified', and I write as a former President of the IAAA and probably the oldest-established living practitioner of space art (first published in 1952). ~~DAVIDAHARDY~~
+Would the person who made these claims re. 'original research' and 'unverified claims' please specify what and where these are -- and what evidence they would accept as verification? The artists writing on this page seem to be the best qualified to comment. ~~DAVIDAHARDY~~