Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadROM: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for MadROM
 
Lanky (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|MadROM}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadROM|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 June 5#{{anchorencode:MadROM}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|MadROM}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadROM|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 June 5#{{anchorencode:MadROM}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Contested prod. Article appears to make no assertion of notability or of reliable sources discussing this MUD. [[User:JavaTenor|JavaTenor]] 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Contested prod. Article appears to make no assertion of notability or of reliable sources discussing this MUD. [[User:JavaTenor|JavaTenor]] 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' No assertions of notability, nor could any sources be found which might qualify this for inclusion. Aside from two edits by [[User:Dflax@yahoo.com]] and the original IP editor (both of which have a combined total of less than ten edits), all edits to the page have been automated or procedural clean up edits. As far as I can tell, it also meets the CSD categories for G11 (Blatant Advertising), A7 (Unremarkable web content). Cheers, [[user:Lanky|Lanky]] [[User_talk:Lanky|<sup>T</sup>AL<sub>K</sub>]] 15:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:13, 6 June 2007

MadROM

MadROM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod. Article appears to make no assertion of notability or of reliable sources discussing this MUD. JavaTenor 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No assertions of notability, nor could any sources be found which might qualify this for inclusion. Aside from two edits by User:Dflax@yahoo.com and the original IP editor (both of which have a combined total of less than ten edits), all edits to the page have been automated or procedural clean up edits. As far as I can tell, it also meets the CSD categories for G11 (Blatant Advertising), A7 (Unremarkable web content). Cheers, Lanky TALK 15:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]