Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of RAS examples: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=?|text=Content taken from an earlier revision of RAS syndrome. As it stands, I see no real point in having such a lis...' |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{la|List of RAS examples}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of RAS examples|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 June 10#{{anchorencode:List of RAS examples}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|List of RAS examples}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of RAS examples|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 June 10#{{anchorencode:List of RAS examples}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Content taken from an earlier revision of [[RAS syndrome]]. As it stands, I see no real point in having such a list - people are smart enough to check if an acronym is redundant or not. Verifying entries also poses a challenge - it's easy to see that something is redundant (PIN number, for example), but it'll be difficult to find sources showing that X instance of RAS is commonly used. '''[[User:Mikm|<span style="color: #36393D;">mi</span>]][[User_talk:Mikm|<span style="color:#B02B2C">km</span>]]''' 20:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC) |
Content taken from an earlier revision of [[RAS syndrome]]. As it stands, I see no real point in having such a list - people are smart enough to check if an acronym is redundant or not and the 3 (as of now) examples provided in [[RAS syndrome]] are more than sufficient. Verifying entries also poses a challenge - it's easy to see that something is redundant (PIN number, for example), but it'll be difficult to find sources showing that X instance of RAS is commonly used. '''[[User:Mikm|<span style="color: #36393D;">mi</span>]][[User_talk:Mikm|<span style="color:#B02B2C">km</span>]]''' 20:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:00, 10 June 2007
- List of RAS examples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Content taken from an earlier revision of RAS syndrome. As it stands, I see no real point in having such a list - people are smart enough to check if an acronym is redundant or not and the 3 (as of now) examples provided in RAS syndrome are more than sufficient. Verifying entries also poses a challenge - it's easy to see that something is redundant (PIN number, for example), but it'll be difficult to find sources showing that X instance of RAS is commonly used. mikm 20:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)